Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCHX
JVMCX vs LMCHX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCHX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.32B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R6
Price$33.85
Change+$0.34 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
JVMCX vs LMCHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCHX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and LMCHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. LMCHX (1.13B). LMCHX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LMCHX (0.78) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCHX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCHX (10 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than LMCHX (0.67). LMCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). LMCHX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: LMCHX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.22 vs. LMCHX (-4.21). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.03 vs. LMCHX (42.41).
| JVMCX | LMCHX | JVMCX / LMCHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.67 | 276% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.67 | 278% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.265 | 0.832 | 1,355% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 1.13B | 2,149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.78 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.22 | -4.21 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.25 | 20.16 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.03 | 42.41 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.05 | 46.03 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement