Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCFX
JVMCX vs LMCFX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCFX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.41
Change-$0.21 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.59B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F
Price$32.58
Change-$0.22 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
JVMCX vs LMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCFX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and LMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. LMCFX (1.1B). LMCFX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LMCFX (0.70) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCFX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCFX (18 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than LMCFX (0.88). LMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). LMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: LMCFX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.87 vs. LMCFX (-7.07). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 43.38 vs. LMCFX (34.85).
| JVMCX | LMCFX | JVMCX / LMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.88 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.88 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.340 | -2.397 | -348% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.6B | 1.1B | 2,142% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.70 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.87 | -7.07 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.57 | 7.03 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.38 | 34.85 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.89 | 29.58 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement