Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCFX
JVMCX vs LMCFX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCFX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.30
Change+$0.17 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.61B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F
Price$33.65
Change+$0.22 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
JVMCX vs LMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a StrongBuy and LMCFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. LMCFX (1.12B). LMCFX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LMCFX (0.75) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCFX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCFX (18 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than LMCFX (0.88). LMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (47.00). LMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: LMCFX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.79 vs. LMCFX (0.28). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.49 vs. LMCFX (46.42).
| JVMCX | LMCFX | JVMCX / LMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.88 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.88 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.905 | 0.809 | 977% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.6B | 1.12B | 2,027% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.75 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.79 | 0.28 | 645% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.12 | 21.26 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.49 | 46.42 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.64 | 36.17 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement