Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCCX
JVMCX vs LMCCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.30
Change+$0.17 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.61B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
Price$30.53
Change+$0.20 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
JVMCX vs LMCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a StrongBuy and LMCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. LMCCX (1.12B). JVMCX (0.00) and LMCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCCX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCCX (28 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than LMCCX (1.78). LMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (47.00). JVMCX (1000) and LMCCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.79 vs. LMCCX (-1.42). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.49 vs. LMCCX (38.42).
| JVMCX | LMCCX | JVMCX / LMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.78 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.78 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.905 | 0.362 | 2,186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.6B | 1.12B | 2,027% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.79 | -1.42 | -126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.12 | 16.36 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.49 | 38.42 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.64 | 24.65 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement