Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LMCCX
JVMCX vs LMCCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LMCCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.32B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
Price$30.30
Change+$0.08 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
JVMCX vs LMCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LMCCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and LMCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. LMCCX (1.13B). JVMCX (0.00) and LMCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . JVMCX was incepted earlier than LMCCX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LMCCX (28 years). JVMCX (1.86) and LMCCX (1.78) have similar cost to investors . LMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). JVMCX (1000) and LMCCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.22 vs. LMCCX (-6.54). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.03 vs. LMCCX (32.64).
| JVMCX | LMCCX | JVMCX / LMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.78 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.78 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.265 | -0.394 | -2,856% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 1.13B | 2,149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.22 | -6.54 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.25 | 14.05 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.03 | 32.64 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.05 | 30.66 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement