Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LAVLX
JVMCX vs LAVLX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LAVLX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.30
Change+$0.17 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.61B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock A
Price$34.00
Change+$0.22 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
JVMCX vs LAVLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LAVLX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a StrongBuy and LAVLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. LAVLX (1.12B). LAVLX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LAVLX (0.56) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LAVLX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LAVLX (42 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than LAVLX (1.03). LAVLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMCX (47.00). JVMCX (1000) and LAVLX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.79 vs. LAVLX (0.21). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.49 vs. LAVLX (45.87).
| JVMCX | LAVLX | JVMCX / LAVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.03 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.03 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.905 | 0.741 | 1,067% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.6B | 1.12B | 2,027% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.79 | 0.21 | 840% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.12 | 20.94 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.49 | 45.87 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.64 | 35.13 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement