It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
JVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAMA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
JVA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAMA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
JVA (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.50% price change this week, while MAMA (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +5.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.43%.
JVA is expected to report earnings on Jan 01, 2025.
MAMA is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
JVA | MAMA | JVA / MAMA | |
Capitalization | 8.93M | 187M | 5% |
EBITDA | 1.57M | 9.86M | 16% |
Gain YTD | 228.022 | 67.006 | 340% |
P/E Ratio | 26.74 | 26.24 | 102% |
Revenue | 69.4M | 96.4M | 72% |
Total Cash | 2.41M | 5.56M | 43% |
Total Debt | 7.91M | 15.2M | 52% |
JVA | MAMA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JVA's Valuation (74) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MAMA (89) in the null industry. This means that JVA’s stock grew similarly to MAMA’s over the last 12 months.
MAMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JVA (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew significantly faster than JVA’s over the last 12 months.
MAMA's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JVA (89) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew significantly faster than JVA’s over the last 12 months.
JVA's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MAMA (40) in the null industry. This means that JVA’s stock grew similarly to MAMA’s over the last 12 months.
MAMA's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JVA (91) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew significantly faster than JVA’s over the last 12 months.
JVA | MAMA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago85% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago77% | 3 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago75% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that JVA and MAMA have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JVA and MAMA's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
JVA | 100% | -5.84% | ||
MAMA - JVA | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.26% | ||
SENEA - JVA | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
LW - JVA | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.41% | ||
INGR - JVA | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
FRPT - JVA | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MAMA and DAR have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAMA and DAR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MAMA | 100% | -2.26% | ||
DAR - MAMA | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.55% | ||
NATR - MAMA | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.83% | ||
USNA - MAMA | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.96% | ||
JVA - MAMA | 23% Poorly correlated | -5.84% | ||
BRBR - MAMA | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
More |