Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JUST vs RFFC
JUST vs RFFC Comparison
Open Charts JUST vs RFFC
Goldman Sachs JUST US Large Cap Eq ETF
Price$98.04
Change+$0.28 (+0.29%)
Volume$4.34K
Net Assets505.92M
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Price$69.14
Change+$0.65 (+0.95%)
Volume$23
Net Assets27.56M
JUST vs RFFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JUST vs. RFFC commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JUST is a Hold and RFFC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JUST has more net assets: 506M vs. RFFC (27.6M). RFFC has a higher annual dividend yield than JUST: RFFC (1.475) vs JUST (1.386). JUST was incepted earlier than RFFC: JUST (8 years) vs RFFC (10 years). JUST (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than RFFC (0.48). RFFC has a higher turnover JUST (14.00) vs JUST (14.00).
| JUST | RFFC | JUST / RFFC | |
| Gain YTD | 1.386 | 1.475 | 94% |
| Net Assets | 506M | 27.6M | 1,833% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.48 | 42% |
| Turnover | 14.00 | 33.00 | 42% |
| Yield | 1.02 | 0.78 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| JUST | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 12 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
JUST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JUST has been closely correlated with OWL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JUST jumps, then OWL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JUST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JUST | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| OWL - JUST | 69% Closely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| SOFI - JUST | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| TT - JUST | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| TFC - JUST | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| VNT - JUST | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.41% | ||
More | ||||
RFFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFFC has been loosely correlated with SBGSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RFFC jumps, then SBGSY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RFFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFFC | 100% | N/A | ||
| SBGSY - RFFC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| TT - RFFC | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| BKR - RFFC | 53% Loosely correlated | +4.04% | ||
| ITOCY - RFFC | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| LIN - RFFC | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
More | ||||