JUPGF
Price
$1.08
Change
+$0.57 (+111.76%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
7.31M
KGLDF
Price
$0.55
Change
-$0.04 (-6.78%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

JUPGF vs KGLDF

Header iconJUPGF vs KGLDF Comparison
Open Charts JUPGF vs KGLDFBanner chart's image
Atlas Critical Minerals
Price$1.08
Change+$0.57 (+111.76%)
Volume$100
Capitalization7.31M
King Global Ventures
Price$0.55
Change-$0.04 (-6.78%)
Volume$11.05K
Capitalization1.16M
JUPGF vs KGLDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JUPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JUPGF vs. KGLDF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JUPGF is a Hold and KGLDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (JUPGF: $1.08 vs. KGLDF: $0.55)
Brand notoriety: JUPGF and KGLDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JUPGF: 48% vs. KGLDF: 35%
Market capitalization -- JUPGF: $7.31M vs. KGLDF: $1.16M
JUPGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.31M. KGLDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JUPGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKGLDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • JUPGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KGLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KGLDF is a better buy in the long-term than JUPGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JUPGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGLDF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JUPGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KGLDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JUPGF is a better buy in the short-term than KGLDF.

Price Growth

JUPGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +52.76% price change this week, while KGLDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -16.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JUPGF($7.31M) has a higher market cap than KGLDF($1.16M). KGLDF YTD gains are higher at: 96.429 vs. JUPGF (66.154). JUPGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -528.67K vs. KGLDF (-1.42M). JUPGF (0) and KGLDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
JUPGFKGLDFJUPGF / KGLDF
Capitalization7.31M1.16M628%
EBITDA-528.67K-1.42M37%
Gain YTD66.15496.42969%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total CashN/A114K-
Total DebtN/A41.5K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JUPGF vs KGLDF: Fundamental Ratings
JUPGF
KGLDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5096
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90100
SMR RATING
1..100
10098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3736
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KGLDF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as JUPGF (82). This means that KGLDF’s stock grew similarly to JUPGF’s over the last 12 months.

JUPGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as KGLDF (100). This means that JUPGF’s stock grew similarly to KGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

KGLDF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as JUPGF (100). This means that KGLDF’s stock grew similarly to JUPGF’s over the last 12 months.

KGLDF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as JUPGF (37). This means that KGLDF’s stock grew similarly to JUPGF’s over the last 12 months.

KGLDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as JUPGF (100). This means that KGLDF’s stock grew similarly to JUPGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JUPGFKGLDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JUPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FFXDF18.440.14
+0.77%
Fairfax India Hldgs Corp
DPXCF0.04N/A
N/A
DelphX Capital Markets Inc.
GHIFF8.13N/A
N/A
Gamehost, Inc.
AILIP67.00N/A
N/A
Ameren Illinois Company
MDDNF3.43N/A
N/A
Meridian Energy LTD

JUPGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JUPGF has been loosely correlated with GMINF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JUPGF jumps, then GMINF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JUPGF
1D Price
Change %
JUPGF100%
+111.76%
GMINF - JUPGF
36%
Loosely correlated
-8.03%
HELOF - JUPGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JAGGF - JUPGF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.93%
KDKGF - JUPGF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
IRVRF - JUPGF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
More

KGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KGLDF and SUNPF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGLDF and SUNPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGLDF
1D Price
Change %
KGLDF100%
-6.78%
SUNPF - KGLDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGSSF - KGLDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KDKGF - KGLDF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
IRVRF - KGLDF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
JUPGF - KGLDF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+111.76%
More