JUMSF
Price
$27.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.56B
ZSHGY
Price
$18.00
Change
-$1.70 (-8.63%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.27B
Interact to see
Advertisement

JUMSF vs ZSHGY

Header iconJUMSF vs ZSHGY Comparison
Open Charts JUMSF vs ZSHGYBanner chart's image
Jumbo SA
Price$27.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.56B
Zhongsheng Group Holdings
Price$18.00
Change-$1.70 (-8.63%)
Volume$180
Capitalization4.27B
JUMSF vs ZSHGY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ZSHGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JUMSF vs. ZSHGY commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JUMSF is a Hold and ZSHGY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (JUMSF: $27.50 vs. ZSHGY: $18.00)
Brand notoriety: JUMSF and ZSHGY are both not notable
JUMSF represents the Specialty Stores, while ZSHGY is part of the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JUMSF: 100% vs. ZSHGY: 15%
Market capitalization -- JUMSF: $4.56B vs. ZSHGY: $4.27B
JUMSF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $4.56B. ZSHGY’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $4.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $49.01B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $50.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.16B. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JUMSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileZSHGY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • JUMSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ZSHGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, JUMSF is a better buy in the long-term than ZSHGY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ZSHGY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ZSHGY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

JUMSF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ZSHGY (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -7.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.73%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -2.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.13%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.92% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

@Automotive Aftermarket (-2.64% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JUMSF($4.56B) has a higher market cap than ZSHGY($4.27B). ZSHGY (11.51) and JUMSF (11.50) have similar P/E ratio . ZSHGY YTD gains are higher at: 20.007 vs. JUMSF (0.000).
JUMSFZSHGYJUMSF / ZSHGY
Capitalization4.56B4.27B107%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.00020.007-
P/E Ratio11.5011.51100%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JUMSF vs ZSHGY: Fundamental Ratings
JUMSF
ZSHGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16100
SMR RATING
1..100
4999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
558
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZSHGY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as JUMSF (27). This means that ZSHGY’s stock grew similarly to JUMSF’s over the last 12 months.

JUMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZSHGY (100). This means that JUMSF’s stock grew significantly faster than ZSHGY’s over the last 12 months.

JUMSF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZSHGY (99). This means that JUMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZSHGY’s over the last 12 months.

ZSHGY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as JUMSF (70). This means that ZSHGY’s stock grew similarly to JUMSF’s over the last 12 months.

ZSHGY's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JUMSF (55). This means that ZSHGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than JUMSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JUMSFZSHGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ZSHGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASET33.370.24
+0.71%
FlexShares Real Assets Allocation ETF
ZJAN26.850.03
+0.11%
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January
FEUS72.11N/A
N/A
FlexShares ESG & Clmt US Lrg Cap Cr Idx
TBFC27.99N/A
N/A
The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF
ZROZ67.43-0.15
-0.22%
PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Trs ETF

JUMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JUMSF and JZXN have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JUMSF and JZXN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JUMSF
1D Price
Change %
JUMSF100%
N/A
JZXN - JUMSF
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.60%
DRVN - JUMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
FHNGY - JUMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WINH - JUMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZSHGY - JUMSF
0%
Poorly correlated
-8.63%
More

ZSHGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZSHGY and KXIN have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZSHGY and KXIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZSHGY
1D Price
Change %
ZSHGY100%
-8.63%
KXIN - ZSHGY
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.90%
MNSO - ZSHGY
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
LESL - ZSHGY
7%
Poorly correlated
-6.22%
EVGO - ZSHGY
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
ARKO - ZSHGY
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
More