JUMSF
Price
$27.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.07B
WINH
Price
$0.20
Change
+$0.07 (+53.85%)
Updated
May 29 closing price
Capitalization
7.5M
Interact to see
Advertisement

JUMSF vs WINH

Header iconJUMSF vs WINH Comparison
Open Charts JUMSF vs WINHBanner chart's image
Jumbo SA
Price$27.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.07B
Willcox International Holdings
Price$0.20
Change+$0.07 (+53.85%)
Volume$200
Capitalization7.5M
JUMSF vs WINH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WINH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JUMSF vs. WINH commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JUMSF is a Buy and WINH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (JUMSF: $27.50 vs. WINH: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: JUMSF and WINH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JUMSF: 100% vs. WINH: 2%
Market capitalization -- JUMSF: $4.07B vs. WINH: $7.5M
JUMSF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $4.07B. WINH’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $7.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JUMSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWINH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • JUMSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WINH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, JUMSF is a better buy in the long-term than WINH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WINH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WINH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

JUMSF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WINH (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+2.51% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JUMSF($4.07B) has a higher market cap than WINH($7.5M). WINH YTD gains are higher at: 14.286 vs. JUMSF (0.000). JUMSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 321M vs. WINH (8.24M). JUMSF has more cash in the bank: 712M vs. WINH (1.19M). WINH has less debt than JUMSF: WINH (5.28M) vs JUMSF (286M). JUMSF has higher revenues than WINH: JUMSF (872M) vs WINH (16.7M).
JUMSFWINHJUMSF / WINH
Capitalization4.07B7.5M54,281%
EBITDA321M8.24M3,898%
Gain YTD0.00014.286-
P/E Ratio16.00N/A-
Revenue872M16.7M5,222%
Total Cash712M1.19M59,732%
Total Debt286M5.28M5,421%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JUMSF vs WINH: Fundamental Ratings
JUMSF
WINH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13100
SMR RATING
1..100
491
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6516
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JUMSF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WINH (100). This means that JUMSF’s stock grew significantly faster than WINH’s over the last 12 months.

JUMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WINH (100). This means that JUMSF’s stock grew significantly faster than WINH’s over the last 12 months.

WINH's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JUMSF (49). This means that WINH’s stock grew somewhat faster than JUMSF’s over the last 12 months.

WINH's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JUMSF (70). This means that WINH’s stock grew somewhat faster than JUMSF’s over the last 12 months.

WINH's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JUMSF (65). This means that WINH’s stock grew somewhat faster than JUMSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JUMSFWINH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WINH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZEOX2.000.01
+0.76%
Zeo ScientifiX Inc.
CGIUF1.74N/A
N/A
ESR REIT
IVCHF1.70N/A
N/A
INVICTA HOLDINGS LTD.
MSBB14.65N/A
N/A
Mercer Bancorp, Inc.
AETUF20.99-0.01
-0.07%
Arc Resources Ltd.

JUMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JUMSF and JZXN have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JUMSF and JZXN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JUMSF
1D Price
Change %
JUMSF100%
N/A
JZXN - JUMSF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.40%
DRVN - JUMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
FHNGY - JUMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WINH - JUMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZSHGY - JUMSF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
More

WINH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WINH and SSILF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WINH and SSILF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WINH
1D Price
Change %
WINH100%
N/A
SSILF - WINH
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WFAFY - WINH
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
ARKO - WINH
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
BQ - WINH
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
JUMSF - WINH
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More