JUMSF
Price
$27.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.56B
WINH
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
4.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

JUMSF vs WINH

Header iconJUMSF vs WINH Comparison
Open Charts JUMSF vs WINHBanner chart's image
Jumbo SA
Price$27.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.56B
Willcox International Holdings
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
Capitalization4.16M
JUMSF vs WINH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JUMSF vs. WINH commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JUMSF is a Hold and WINH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (JUMSF: $27.50 vs. WINH: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: JUMSF and WINH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JUMSF: 100% vs. WINH: 41%
Market capitalization -- JUMSF: $4.56B vs. WINH: $4.16M
JUMSF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $4.56B. WINH’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $4.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $49.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JUMSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWINH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • JUMSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WINH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, JUMSF is a better buy in the long-term than WINH.

Price Growth

JUMSF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WINH (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.92% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JUMSF($4.56B) has a higher market cap than WINH($4.16M). JUMSF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. WINH (-69.714).
JUMSFWINHJUMSF / WINH
Capitalization4.56B4.16M109,668%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-69.714-
P/E Ratio11.50N/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JUMSF vs WINH: Fundamental Ratings
JUMSF
WINH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16100
SMR RATING
1..100
491
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7096
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5514
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JUMSF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WINH (100). This means that JUMSF’s stock grew significantly faster than WINH’s over the last 12 months.

JUMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WINH (100). This means that JUMSF’s stock grew significantly faster than WINH’s over the last 12 months.

WINH's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JUMSF (49). This means that WINH’s stock grew somewhat faster than JUMSF’s over the last 12 months.

JUMSF's Price Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as WINH (96). This means that JUMSF’s stock grew similarly to WINH’s over the last 12 months.

WINH's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JUMSF (55). This means that WINH’s stock grew somewhat faster than JUMSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JUMSFWINH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DES33.840.27
+0.80%
WisdomTree US SmallCap Dividend ETF
MID66.480.35
+0.52%
American Century Mid Cap Gr Impact ETF
NBCR30.830.14
+0.45%
Neuberger Berman Core Equity ETF
IDAT36.73N/A
N/A
iShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF
FINS13.02-0.05
-0.38%
Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust

JUMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JUMSF and JZXN have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JUMSF and JZXN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JUMSF
1D Price
Change %
JUMSF100%
N/A
JZXN - JUMSF
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.60%
DRVN - JUMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
FHNGY - JUMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WINH - JUMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZSHGY - JUMSF
0%
Poorly correlated
-8.63%
More

WINH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WINH and SSILF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WINH and SSILF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WINH
1D Price
Change %
WINH100%
N/A
SSILF - WINH
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WFAFY - WINH
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
ARKO - WINH
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
BQ - WINH
3%
Poorly correlated
-7.70%
JUMSF - WINH
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More