JUMSF
Price
$27.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.99B
JZXN
Price
$0.87
Change
-$0.05 (-5.43%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:08 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
50.54M
Interact to see
Advertisement

JUMSF vs JZXN

Header iconJUMSF vs JZXN Comparison
Open Charts JUMSF vs JZXNBanner chart's image
Jumbo SA
Price$27.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.99B
Jiuzi Holdings
Price$0.87
Change-$0.05 (-5.43%)
Volume$844
Capitalization50.54M
JUMSF vs JZXN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JZXN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JUMSF vs. JZXN commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JUMSF is a Buy and JZXN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (JUMSF: $27.50 vs. JZXN: $0.92)
Brand notoriety: JUMSF and JZXN are both not notable
JUMSF represents the Specialty Stores, while JZXN is part of the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JUMSF: 100% vs. JZXN: 67%
Market capitalization -- JUMSF: $4.99B vs. JZXN: $50.54M
JUMSF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $4.99B. JZXN’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $50.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $48.32B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $47.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $3.92B. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JUMSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJZXN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JUMSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JZXN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, JUMSF is a better buy in the long-term than JZXN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JZXN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • JZXN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

JUMSF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JZXN (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -10.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.38%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.75% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

@Automotive Aftermarket (+1.44% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JUMSF($5B) has a higher market cap than JZXN($50.5M). JUMSF has higher P/E ratio than JZXN: JUMSF (11.50) vs JZXN (0.43). JUMSF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. JZXN (-34.113).
JUMSFJZXNJUMSF / JZXN
Capitalization5B50.5M9,891%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-34.113-
P/E Ratio11.500.432,705%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A391K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JUMSF: Fundamental Ratings
JUMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
15
SMR RATING
1..100
49
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JUMSFJZXN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JZXN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDO11.870.02
+0.20%
Western Asset Global Corporate Opportunity Fund Inc
GCAD42.460.03
+0.08%
Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Dfns ETF
OUNZ32.75N/A
N/A
VanEck Merk Gold Trust
YLD19.24-0.01
-0.03%
Principal Active High Yield ETF
LDDR85.64-0.14
-0.17%
Stone Ridge Trust Stone Ridge 2035 Term Income ETF

JUMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JUMSF and JZXN have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JUMSF and JZXN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JUMSF
1D Price
Change %
JUMSF100%
N/A
JZXN - JUMSF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
DRVN - JUMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
FHNGY - JUMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
WINH - JUMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZSHGY - JUMSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JZXN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JZXN and DNLMY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JZXN and DNLMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JZXN
1D Price
Change %
JZXN100%
-2.34%
DNLMY - JZXN
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WINA - JZXN
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
ULTA - JZXN
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
FLWS - JZXN
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
BBWI - JZXN
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.66%
More