Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JULCX vs PACAX
JULCX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts JULCX vs PACAX
JHancock Multimanager Lifestyle Cnsrv R6
Price$12.34
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.35
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets588.47M
JULCX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JULCX vs. PACAX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JULCX is a Hold and PACAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JULCX has more cash in the bank: 1.58B vs. PACAX (588M). JULCX pays higher dividends than PACAX: JULCX (4.06) vs PACAX (3.15). JULCX was incepted earlier than PACAX: JULCX (14 years) vs PACAX (32 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than JULCX (0.82). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. JULCX (16.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JULCX: PACAX (0) vs JULCX (1000000). JULCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.11 vs. PACAX (6.29). JULCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.87 vs. PACAX (11.10).
| JULCX | PACAX | JULCX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.00 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.00 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.309 | 9.155 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 588M | 269% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.06 | 3.15 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.11 | 6.29 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.60 | 29.02 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.87 | 11.10 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.97 | 28.41 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement