Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JULCX vs PACAX
JULCX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts JULCX vs PACAX
JHancock Multimanager Lifestyle Cnsrv R6
Price$12.37
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.28
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets577.87M
JULCX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JULCX vs. PACAX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JULCX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JULCX has more cash in the bank: 1.59B vs. PACAX (578M). JULCX pays higher dividends than PACAX: JULCX (4.04) vs PACAX (3.40). JULCX was incepted earlier than PACAX: JULCX (14 years) vs PACAX (32 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than JULCX (0.82). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. JULCX (16.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JULCX: PACAX (0) vs JULCX (1000000). JULCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. PACAX (6.45). JULCX (11.80) and PACAX (11.67) have equivalent 5 years return.
| JULCX | PACAX | JULCX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.00 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.00 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.374 | 8.289 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 578M | 276% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.04 | 3.40 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.10 | 6.45 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.45 | 21.45 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.80 | 11.67 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.86 | 28.74 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers