JUBPF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.02 (+50.00%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
260.43M
MP
Price
$21.41
Change
+$0.54 (+2.59%)
Updated
Jan 22, 01:18 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.37B
29 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

JUBPF vs MP

Header iconJUBPF vs MP Comparison
Open Charts JUBPF vs MPBanner chart's image
Jubilee Metals Group
Price$0.06
Change+$0.02 (+50.00%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization260.43M
MP Materials
Price$21.41
Change+$0.54 (+2.59%)
Volume$101
Capitalization2.37B
JUBPF vs MP Comparison Chart
Loading...
MP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JUBPF vs. MP commentary
Jan 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JUBPF is a Hold and MP is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 22, 2025
Stock price -- (JUBPF: $0.06 vs. MP: $20.87)
Brand notoriety: JUBPF and MP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JUBPF: 54% vs. MP: 98%
Market capitalization -- JUBPF: $260.43M vs. MP: $2.37B
JUBPF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $260.43M. MP’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JUBPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JUBPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MP is a better buy in the long-term than JUBPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

JUBPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +35.27% price change this week, while MP (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +7.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

MP is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.44% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MP($2.37B) has a higher market cap than JUBPF($260M). MP has higher P/E ratio than JUBPF: MP (107.71) vs JUBPF (15.85). MP YTD gains are higher at: 33.782 vs. JUBPF (31.765). MP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 94M vs. JUBPF (34.2M). MP has more cash in the bank: 998M vs. JUBPF (11.7M). JUBPF has less debt than MP: JUBPF (16.1M) vs MP (689M). MP has higher revenues than JUBPF: MP (253M) vs JUBPF (140M).
JUBPFMPJUBPF / MP
Capitalization260M2.37B11%
EBITDA34.2M94M36%
Gain YTD31.76533.78294%
P/E Ratio15.85107.7115%
Revenue140M253M55%
Total Cash11.7M998M1%
Total Debt16.1M689M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JUBPF: Fundamental Ratings
JUBPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
81
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
79
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

JUBPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JUBPF and FLMCF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JUBPF and FLMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JUBPF
1D Price
Change %
JUBPF100%
N/A
FLMCF - JUBPF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MANVF - JUBPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MP - JUBPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
JIAXF - JUBPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AXREF - JUBPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-9.20%
More

MP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MP has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MP jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MP
1D Price
Change %
MP100%
-0.33%
LAC - MP
49%
Loosely correlated
-8.31%
HBM - MP
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.44%
PLL - MP
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
IE - MP
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
SGML - MP
41%
Loosely correlated
-3.91%
More