Advertisement
JSML vs UMBF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JSML is a Buy and UMBF is a StrongBuy.
UMBF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| JSML | UMBF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 21 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 86% | 10 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 63% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PISDX | 15.79 | 0.05 | +0.32% |
| Columbia Pyrford International Stock A | |||
| FIADX | 60.81 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor International Discv I | |||
| JISGX | 23.29 | -0.08 | -0.34% |
| JPMorgan Small Cap Growth L | |||
| EAEAX | 39.53 | -0.27 | -0.68% |
| Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Eq Aset Allc A | |||
| MLMCX | 22.58 | -0.26 | -1.14% |
| Morgan Stanley Instl Global Core C | |||
JSML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JSML has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JSML jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JSML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JSML | 100% | -0.69% | ||
| ENVA - JSML | 76% Closely correlated | -7.72% | ||
| UMBF - JSML | 76% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| AX - JSML | 75% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| SFBS - JSML | 75% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| HLNE - JSML | 73% Closely correlated | -3.74% | ||
More | ||||
UMBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMBF has been closely correlated with FULT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMBF jumps, then FULT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMBF | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| FULT - UMBF | 89% Closely correlated | +2.66% | ||
| ONB - UMBF | 89% Closely correlated | +1.97% | ||
| FNB - UMBF | 88% Closely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| HWC - UMBF | 88% Closely correlated | +3.15% | ||
| TRMK - UMBF | 88% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||