JSDA
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.01 (-3.85%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
29.54M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UPCHY
Price
$103.30
Change
-$5.78 (-5.30%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
4.45B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

JSDA vs UPCHY

Header iconJSDA vs UPCHY Comparison
Open Charts JSDA vs UPCHYBanner chart's image
Jones Soda
Price$0.25
Change-$0.01 (-3.85%)
Volume$38.48K
Capitalization29.54M
Uni-President China Holdings
Price$103.30
Change-$5.78 (-5.30%)
Volume$2
Capitalization4.45B
JSDA vs UPCHY Comparison Chart in %
JSDA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UPCHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JSDA vs. UPCHY commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JSDA is a Hold and UPCHY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (JSDA: $0.26 vs. UPCHY: $103.30)
Brand notoriety: JSDA and UPCHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JSDA: 14% vs. UPCHY: 34%
Market capitalization -- JSDA: $30.08M vs. UPCHY: $4.45B
JSDA [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $30.08M. UPCHY’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $4.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $307.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $23.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JSDA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUPCHY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • JSDA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UPCHY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UPCHY is a better buy in the long-term than JSDA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JSDA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UPCHY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JSDA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UPCHY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UPCHY is a better buy in the short-term than JSDA.

Price Growth

JSDA (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +3.95% price change this week, while UPCHY (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -5.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +2.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.79%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+2.67% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UPCHY($4.45B) has a higher market cap than JSDA($29.5M). UPCHY YTD gains are higher at: -5.299 vs. JSDA (-11.307). UPCHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.97B vs. JSDA (-3.84M). UPCHY has more cash in the bank: 5.57B vs. JSDA (199K). JSDA has less debt than UPCHY: JSDA (1.9M) vs UPCHY (2.25B). UPCHY has higher revenues than JSDA: UPCHY (32B) vs JSDA (17.6M).
JSDAUPCHYJSDA / UPCHY
Capitalization29.5M4.45B1%
EBITDA-3.84M2.97B-0%
Gain YTD-11.307-5.299213%
P/E RatioN/A14.35-
Revenue17.6M32B0%
Total Cash199K5.57B0%
Total Debt1.9M2.25B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JSDA vs UPCHY: Fundamental Ratings
JSDA
UPCHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5541
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9452
SMR RATING
1..100
9821
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4656
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10073
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
856

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UPCHY's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JSDA (76). This means that UPCHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than JSDA’s over the last 12 months.

UPCHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JSDA (94). This means that UPCHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than JSDA’s over the last 12 months.

UPCHY's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JSDA (98). This means that UPCHY’s stock grew significantly faster than JSDA’s over the last 12 months.

JSDA's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as UPCHY (56). This means that JSDA’s stock grew similarly to UPCHY’s over the last 12 months.

UPCHY's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as JSDA (100). This means that UPCHY’s stock grew similarly to JSDA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JSDAUPCHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JSDA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UPCHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AKZOF69.914.86
+7.47%
Akzo Nobel N.V.
UBAAF6.80N/A
N/A
Urbana Corp.
AFNL177.01N/A
N/A
Amfin Financial Corp.
BPOPO24.90N/A
N/A
Popular, Inc.
WFRSF1.90-0.10
-5.00%
West African Resources Ltd.

JSDA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JSDA and FQVTF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JSDA and FQVTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JSDA
1D Price
Change %
JSDA100%
-2.79%
FQVTF - JSDA
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMBVF - JSDA
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTEI - JSDA
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YNAJF - JSDA
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPCHY - JSDA
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UPCHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UPCHY and YNAJF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UPCHY and YNAJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UPCHY
1D Price
Change %
UPCHY100%
-5.30%
YNAJF - UPCHY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FQVTF - UPCHY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JSDA - UPCHY
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
LSDAF - UPCHY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YKLTY - UPCHY
1%
Poorly correlated
-11.06%
More