Advertisement
JQUA vs SEIC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JQUA is a Hold and SEIC is a Hold.
SEIC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| JQUA | SEIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 51% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FLMB | 23.88 | N/A | +0.02% |
| Franklin Municipal Green Bond ETF | |||
| DFGP | 56.06 | -0.08 | -0.14% |
| Dimensional Global Core Pls Fxd Inc ETF | |||
| ZCSH | 13.31 | -0.03 | -0.26% |
| Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | |||
| MIY | 11.45 | -0.04 | -0.35% |
| Blackrock Muniyield Michigan Quality Fund | |||
| EUAD | 43.24 | -0.74 | -1.68% |
| Select STOXX Europe Aerospace & Defense ETF | |||
JQUA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JQUA has been closely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JQUA jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JQUA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JQUA | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| SEIC - JQUA | 81% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| MCO - JQUA | 80% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| CPAY - JQUA | 79% Closely correlated | +2.87% | ||
| MAR - JQUA | 79% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| KEYS - JQUA | 77% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
More | ||||
SEIC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEIC | 100% | -2.49% | ||
| TROW - SEIC | 78% Closely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| BN - SEIC | 77% Closely correlated | -2.85% | ||
| JHG - SEIC | 77% Closely correlated | -4.95% | ||
| AMG - SEIC | 74% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| BX - SEIC | 73% Closely correlated | -3.62% | ||
More | ||||