Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JQLCX vs PACAX
JQLCX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts JQLCX vs PACAX
JHancock Multimanager Lifestyle Cnsrv R2
Price$12.39
Change+$0.04 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.28
Change-$0.07 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets588.47M
JQLCX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JQLCX vs. PACAX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JQLCX is a Hold and PACAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JQLCX has more cash in the bank: 1.58B vs. PACAX (588M). JQLCX pays higher dividends than PACAX: JQLCX (3.59) vs PACAX (3.15). JQLCX was incepted earlier than PACAX: JQLCX (14 years) vs PACAX (32 years). JQLCX (1.32) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. JQLCX (16.00). JQLCX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JQLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.85 vs. PACAX (5.45). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.39 vs. JQLCX (10.00).
| JQLCX | PACAX | JQLCX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.00 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.00 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.173 | 8.482 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 588M | 269% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.59 | 3.15 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.85 | 5.45 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.15 | 29.17 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.00 | 11.39 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.85 | 26.78 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers