Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JQLCX vs PACAX
JQLCX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts JQLCX vs PACAX
JHancock Multimanager Lifestyle Cnsrv R2
Price$12.35
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.26
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets577.87M
JQLCX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JQLCX vs. PACAX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JQLCX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JQLCX has more cash in the bank: 1.59B vs. PACAX (578M). JQLCX (3.57) and PACAX (3.40) have matching dividends . JQLCX was incepted earlier than PACAX: JQLCX (14 years) vs PACAX (32 years). JQLCX (1.32) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. JQLCX (16.00). JQLCX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JQLCX (6.59) and PACAX (6.45) have marching annual gain over last year. PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.67 vs. JQLCX (9.25).
| JQLCX | PACAX | JQLCX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.00 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.00 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.933 | 8.289 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 578M | 276% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 3.40 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.59 | 6.45 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.80 | 21.45 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.25 | 11.67 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.81 | 28.74 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers