Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JQLCX vs PACAX
JQLCX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts JQLCX vs PACAX
JHancock Multimanager Lifestyle Cnsrv R2
Price$12.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.98
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets569.38M
JQLCX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JQLCX vs. PACAX commentary
Jul 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JQLCX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JQLCX has more cash in the bank: 1.59B vs. PACAX (569M). JQLCX pays higher dividends than PACAX: JQLCX (3.63) vs PACAX (2.98). JQLCX was incepted earlier than PACAX: JQLCX (13 years) vs PACAX (31 years). JQLCX (1.32) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. JQLCX (16.00). JQLCX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JQLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.84 vs. PACAX (5.73). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.73 vs. JQLCX (9.13).
| JQLCX | PACAX | JQLCX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.00 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.00 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.336 | 4.776 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 569M | 279% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.63 | 2.98 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.84 | 5.73 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.13 | 18.40 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.13 | 9.73 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.71 | 22.73 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement