JPSTF
Price
$10.36
Change
-$0.14 (-1.33%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
30.4B
SBNC
Price
$8400.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

JPSTF vs SBNC

Header iconJPSTF vs SBNC Comparison
Open Charts JPSTF vs SBNCBanner chart's image
JAPAN POST BK
Price$10.36
Change-$0.14 (-1.33%)
Volume$68.13K
Capitalization30.4B
Southern Bancshares (N.C.)
Price$8400.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10
CapitalizationN/A
JPSTF vs SBNC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JPSTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JPSTF vs. SBNC commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JPSTF is a Hold and SBNC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (JPSTF: $10.36 vs. SBNC: $8400.00)
Brand notoriety: JPSTF and SBNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JPSTF: 568% vs. SBNC: 174%
Market capitalization -- JPSTF: $30.4B vs. SBNC: $0
JPSTF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $30.4B. SBNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JPSTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBNC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • JPSTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBNC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, JPSTF is a better buy in the long-term than SBNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JPSTF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBNC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JPSTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SBNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both JPSTF and SBNC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

JPSTF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SBNC (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JPSTF YTD gains are higher at: 12.557 vs. SBNC (3.857).
JPSTFSBNCJPSTF / SBNC
Capitalization30.4BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.5573.857326%
P/E Ratio12.56N/A-
Revenue1.58TN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.63TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JPSTF vs SBNC: Fundamental Ratings
JPSTF
SBNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56100
SMR RATING
1..100
1100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7699
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBNC's Valuation (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JPSTF (90). This means that SBNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than JPSTF’s over the last 12 months.

JPSTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBNC (100). This means that JPSTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBNC’s over the last 12 months.

JPSTF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SBNC (100). This means that JPSTF’s stock grew significantly faster than SBNC’s over the last 12 months.

JPSTF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SBNC (52). This means that JPSTF’s stock grew similarly to SBNC’s over the last 12 months.

JPSTF's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as SBNC (99). This means that JPSTF’s stock grew similarly to SBNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JPSTFSBNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
22%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JPSTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LITM4.030.06
+1.51%
Snow Lake Resources Ltd
KELYB12.11N/A
N/A
Kelly Services
JYNT11.69-0.07
-0.60%
Joint Corp (The)
EA155.37-1.66
-1.06%
Electronic Arts
MHO115.44-2.64
-2.24%
M/I Homes

JPSTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPSTF has been loosely correlated with JPHLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JPSTF jumps, then JPHLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JPSTF
1D Price
Change %
JPSTF100%
N/A
JPHLF - JPSTF
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GVFF - JPSTF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RAIFF - JPSTF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBNC - JPSTF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MDIBF - JPSTF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SBNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBNC and BPOP have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBNC and BPOP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBNC
1D Price
Change %
SBNC100%
N/A
BPOP - SBNC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
ORRF - SBNC
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
CFBK - SBNC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
JPSTF - SBNC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBNC - SBNC
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
More