JPM
Price
$264.24
Change
-$2.56 (-0.96%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
573.02B
48 days until earnings call
WFC
Price
$77.50
Change
-$1.13 (-1.44%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
203.96B
48 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

JPM vs WFC

Header iconJPM vs WFC Comparison
Open Charts JPM vs WFCBanner chart's image
JPMorgan Chase & Co
Price$264.24
Change-$2.56 (-0.96%)
Volume$12.84M
Capitalization573.02B
Wells Fargo & Co
Price$77.50
Change-$1.13 (-1.44%)
Volume$18.21M
Capitalization203.96B
JPM vs WFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
JPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JPM vs. WFC commentary
Feb 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JPM is a StrongBuy and WFC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 22, 2025
Stock price -- (JPM: $279.95 vs. WFC: $80.78)
Brand notoriety: JPM and WFC are both notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JPM: 84% vs. WFC: 100%
Market capitalization -- JPM: $573.02B vs. WFC: $203.96B
JPM [@Major Banks] is valued at $573.02B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $203.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JPM’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • JPM’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, both JPM and WFC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JPM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JPM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JPM is a better buy in the short-term than WFC.

Price Growth

JPM (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.80% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was +1.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

JPM is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.13% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JPM($573B) has a higher market cap than WFC($204B). JPM (12.26) and WFC (11.93) have similar P/E ratio . JPM YTD gains are higher at: 17.390 vs. WFC (15.574). WFC has more cash in the bank: 33B vs. JPM (26.1B). WFC has less debt than JPM: WFC (219B) vs JPM (437B). JPM has higher revenues than WFC: JPM (155B) vs WFC (82.6B).
JPMWFCJPM / WFC
Capitalization573B204B281%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.39015.574112%
P/E Ratio12.2611.93103%
Revenue155B82.6B188%
Total Cash26.1B33B79%
Total Debt437B219B200%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JPM vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
JPM
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2480
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
918
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1011
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2820
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WFC's Valuation (85) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (97). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (18). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (2). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (11). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (28). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JPMWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
JPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

JPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPM has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JPM jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JPM
1D Price
Change %
JPM100%
+1.21%
BAC - JPM
73%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
WFC - JPM
73%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
C - JPM
70%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
NTB - JPM
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
CM - JPM
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
More

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
+1.00%
BAC - WFC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
JPM - WFC
73%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
C - WFC
70%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
CM - WFC
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
NTB - WFC
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
More