JPM
Price
$309.50
Change
-$10.91 (-3.41%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
872.24B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WFC
Price
$84.70
Change
-$1.55 (-1.80%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
270.78B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

JPM vs WFC

Header iconJPM vs WFC Comparison
Open Charts JPM vs WFCBanner chart's image
JPMorgan Chase & Co
Price$309.50
Change-$10.91 (-3.41%)
Volume$47.33K
Capitalization872.24B
Wells Fargo & Co
Price$84.70
Change-$1.55 (-1.80%)
Volume$97.09K
Capitalization270.78B
JPM vs WFC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JPM vs. WFC commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JPM is a Buy and WFC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (JPM: $320.41 vs. WFC: $86.26)
Brand notoriety: JPM and WFC are both notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JPM: 128% vs. WFC: 111%
Market capitalization -- JPM: $872.24B vs. WFC: $270.78B
JPM [@Major Banks] is valued at $872.24B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $270.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $872.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $142.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JPM’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • JPM’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both JPM and WFC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JPM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JPM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WFC is a better buy in the short-term than JPM.

Price Growth

JPM (@Major Banks) experienced а +2.80% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was -0.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

JPM is expected to report earnings on Jan 13, 2026.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.91% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JPM($872B) has a higher market cap than WFC($271B). JPM has higher P/E ratio than WFC: JPM (15.87) vs WFC (14.21). JPM YTD gains are higher at: 36.495 vs. WFC (25.476). WFC has more cash in the bank: 34.8B vs. JPM (23.8B). WFC has less debt than JPM: WFC (214B) vs JPM (485B). JPM has higher revenues than WFC: JPM (175B) vs WFC (82.8B).
JPMWFCJPM / WFC
Capitalization872B271B322%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD36.49525.476143%
P/E Ratio15.8714.21112%
Revenue175B82.8B211%
Total Cash23.8B34.8B68%
Total Debt485B214B227%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JPM vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
JPM
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1678
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2322
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2450
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WFC's Valuation (79) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (88). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (8). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (2). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Price Growth Rating (22) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (23). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (50). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JPMWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JPM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPLG80.00N/A
N/A
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
BAMY28.14N/A
-0.01%
Brookstone Yield ETF
TGRT44.84-0.07
-0.16%
T. Rowe Price Growth ETF
TMAT26.75-0.35
-1.29%
Main Thematic Innovation ETF
IMST21.25-0.52
-2.39%
Bitwise MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF

JPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPM has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JPM jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JPM
1D Price
Change %
JPM100%
+1.52%
BAC - JPM
82%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
C - JPM
81%
Closely correlated
+2.09%
WFC - JPM
81%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
BK - JPM
71%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
BCS - JPM
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
More

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
+0.08%
BAC - WFC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
C - WFC
80%
Closely correlated
+2.09%
JPM - WFC
77%
Closely correlated
+1.52%
BK - WFC
72%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
EWBC - WFC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
More