JPM
Price
$261.06
Change
-$1.97 (-0.75%)
Updated
Jan 22, 01:03 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
573.02B
79 days until earnings call
WFC
Price
$77.85
Change
+$0.77 (+1.00%)
Updated
Jan 21 closing price
Capitalization
203.96B
79 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

JPM vs WFC

Header iconJPM vs WFC Comparison
Open Charts JPM vs WFCBanner chart's image
JPMorgan Chase & Co
Price$261.06
Change-$1.97 (-0.75%)
Volume$13.2K
Capitalization573.02B
Wells Fargo & Co
Price$77.85
Change+$0.77 (+1.00%)
Volume$21.06M
Capitalization203.96B
JPM vs WFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
JPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JPM vs. WFC commentary
Jan 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JPM is a Hold and WFC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 22, 2025
Stock price -- (JPM: $263.03 vs. WFC: $77.85)
Brand notoriety: JPM and WFC are both notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JPM: 146% vs. WFC: 128%
Market capitalization -- JPM: $573.02B vs. WFC: $203.96B
JPM [@Major Banks] is valued at $573.02B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $203.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JPM’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • JPM’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, both JPM and WFC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JPM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JPM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JPM is a better buy in the short-term than WFC.

Price Growth

JPM (@Major Banks) experienced а +6.29% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was +9.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

JPM is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.18% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JPM($573B) has a higher market cap than WFC($204B). JPM (12.26) and WFC (11.93) have similar P/E ratio . WFC YTD gains are higher at: 10.834 vs. JPM (10.295). WFC has more cash in the bank: 33B vs. JPM (26.1B). WFC has less debt than JPM: WFC (219B) vs JPM (437B). JPM has higher revenues than WFC: JPM (155B) vs WFC (82.6B).
JPMWFCJPM / WFC
Capitalization573B204B281%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.29510.83495%
P/E Ratio12.2611.93103%
Revenue155B82.6B188%
Total Cash26.1B33B79%
Total Debt437B219B200%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JPM vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
JPM
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1030
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
107
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3220
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WFC's Valuation (83) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (96). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (30). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (2). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Price Growth Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (10). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (32). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JPMWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
46%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
JPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

JPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPM has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JPM jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JPM
1D Price
Change %
JPM100%
+1.49%
BAC - JPM
74%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
WFC - JPM
73%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
C - JPM
70%
Closely correlated
+2.10%
NTB - JPM
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
CM - JPM
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
More

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
+1.00%
BAC - WFC
78%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
JPM - WFC
73%
Closely correlated
+1.49%
C - WFC
70%
Closely correlated
+2.10%
CM - WFC
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
NTB - WFC
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
More