JPM
Price
$305.89
Change
-$0.53 (-0.17%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
824.74B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WFC
Price
$90.49
Change
-$0.15 (-0.17%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
279.85B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

JPM vs WFC

Header iconJPM vs WFC Comparison
Open Charts JPM vs WFCBanner chart's image
JPMorgan Chase & Co
Price$305.89
Change-$0.53 (-0.17%)
Volume$11.95M
Capitalization824.74B
Wells Fargo & Co
Price$90.49
Change-$0.15 (-0.17%)
Volume$18.31M
Capitalization279.85B
JPM vs WFC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JPM vs. WFC commentary
Feb 01, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JPM is a StrongBuy and WFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 01, 2026
Stock price -- (JPM: $305.89 vs. WFC: $90.49)
Brand notoriety: JPM and WFC are both notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JPM: 113% vs. WFC: 124%
Market capitalization -- JPM: $824.74B vs. WFC: $279.85B
JPM [@Major Banks] is valued at $824.74B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $279.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $824.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $146.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JPM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • JPM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, JPM is a better buy in the long-term than WFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JPM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JPM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WFC is a better buy in the short-term than JPM.

Price Growth

JPM (@Major Banks) experienced а +2.74% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was +4.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

JPM is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2026.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.84% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JPM($825B) has a higher market cap than WFC($280B). JPM has higher P/E ratio than WFC: JPM (15.28) vs WFC (14.46). WFC YTD gains are higher at: -2.908 vs. JPM (-4.640). WFC has more cash in the bank: 34.8B vs. JPM (21.8B). WFC has less debt than JPM: WFC (214B) vs JPM (497B). JPM has higher revenues than WFC: JPM (179B) vs WFC (82.8B).
JPMWFCJPM / WFC
Capitalization825B280B295%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.640-2.908160%
P/E Ratio15.2814.46106%
Revenue179B82.8B216%
Total Cash21.8B34.8B63%
Total Debt497B214B232%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JPM vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
JPM
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8065
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1210
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3652
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5555

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WFC's Valuation (80) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (82). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (12). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (2). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (56). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (52). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JPMWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JPM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPB26.00N/A
N/A
Merrill Lynch Depositor
SCHQ31.67-0.13
-0.41%
Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
TUG40.08-0.62
-1.52%
STF Tactical Growth ETF
VXUS79.66-1.29
-1.59%
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
CNRG98.10-3.11
-3.07%
Stt Strt® SPDR® S&P KenshoClnPwrETF

JPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPM has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JPM jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JPM
1D Price
Change %
JPM100%
-0.17%
BAC - JPM
82%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
C - JPM
79%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
WFC - JPM
75%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
BK - JPM
71%
Closely correlated
-1.29%
BCS - JPM
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
More

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
-0.17%
BAC - WFC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
C - WFC
79%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
JPM - WFC
75%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
EWBC - WFC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
BK - WFC
67%
Closely correlated
-1.29%
More