JPM
Price
$312.35
Change
+$4.47 (+1.45%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
840.96B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UBS
Price
$38.84
Change
+$0.09 (+0.23%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
120.46B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

JPM vs UBS

Header iconJPM vs UBS Comparison
Open Charts JPM vs UBSBanner chart's image
JPMorgan Chase & Co
Price$312.35
Change+$4.47 (+1.45%)
Volume$47.56K
Capitalization840.96B
UBS Group AG
Price$38.84
Change+$0.09 (+0.23%)
Volume$14.45K
Capitalization120.46B
JPM vs UBS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JPM vs. UBS commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JPM is a StrongBuy and UBS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (JPM: $307.84 vs. UBS: $38.75)
Brand notoriety: JPM: Notable vs. UBS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JPM: 24% vs. UBS: 21%
Market capitalization -- JPM: $840.96B vs. UBS: $120.46B
JPM [@Major Banks] is valued at $840.96B. UBS’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $120.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $840.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $140.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JPM’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileUBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • JPM’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • UBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, JPM is a better buy in the long-term than UBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JPM’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JPM’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JPM is a better buy in the short-term than UBS.

Price Growth

JPM (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.60% price change this week, while UBS (@Major Banks) price change was +3.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

JPM is expected to report earnings on Jan 13, 2026.

UBS is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.27% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JPM($841B) has a higher market cap than UBS($120B). UBS has higher P/E ratio than JPM: UBS (17.33) vs JPM (15.30). UBS (31.911) and JPM (31.140) have similar YTD gains . UBS has more cash in the bank: 223B vs. JPM (23.8B). UBS has less debt than JPM: UBS (348B) vs JPM (485B). JPM has higher revenues than UBS: JPM (175B) vs UBS (45.6B).
JPMUBSJPM / UBS
Capitalization841B120B701%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD31.14031.91198%
P/E Ratio15.3017.3388%
Revenue175B45.6B384%
Total Cash23.8B223B11%
Total Debt485B348B139%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JPM vs UBS: Fundamental Ratings
JPM
UBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
810
SMR RATING
1..100
16
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2749
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2981
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UBS's Valuation (72) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (88). This means that UBS’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (10). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (6). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's Price Growth Rating (27) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (49). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBS (81). This means that JPM’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JPMUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JPM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRNW20.440.25
+1.24%
Fidelity Clean Energy ETF
DUSA50.290.16
+0.33%
Davis Select US Equity ETF
ELFY35.81-0.07
-0.19%
ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF
VWO54.14-0.11
-0.20%
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
XPH52.68-1.10
-2.05%
State Street® SPDR® S&P® PhrmctlsETF

JPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPM has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JPM jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JPM
1D Price
Change %
JPM100%
-0.35%
BAC - JPM
82%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
C - JPM
82%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
WFC - JPM
76%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
BK - JPM
71%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
BCS - JPM
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
More

UBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBS has been loosely correlated with C. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBS jumps, then C could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBS
1D Price
Change %
UBS100%
+0.70%
C - UBS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
BCS - UBS
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
MUFG - UBS
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
HSBC - UBS
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
JPM - UBS
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
More