It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
JPM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNTB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
JPM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
JPM (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.98% price change this week, while NTB (@Major Banks) price change was -4.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.83%.
JPM is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2025.
NTB is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.
Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
JPM | NTB | JPM / NTB | |
Capitalization | 573B | 1.49B | 38,405% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 43.018 | 20.095 | 214% |
P/E Ratio | 12.26 | 6.94 | 177% |
Revenue | 155B | 583M | 26,587% |
Total Cash | 26.1B | 96.7M | 26,991% |
Total Debt | 437B | 98.5M | 443,655% |
JPM | NTB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTB's Valuation (93) in the null industry is in the same range as JPM (95) in the Major Banks industry. This means that NTB’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTB (48) in the null industry. This means that JPM’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTB’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NTB (12) in the null industry. This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to NTB’s over the last 12 months.
JPM's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NTB (51) in the null industry. This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to NTB’s over the last 12 months.
NTB's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as JPM (29) in the Major Banks industry. This means that NTB’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.
JPM | NTB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago64% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago40% | 3 days ago60% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago48% | 3 days ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago55% | 3 days ago60% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago54% | 3 days ago57% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 12 days ago64% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago59% | 4 days ago66% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago59% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPM has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JPM jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTB has been loosely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTB jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.