JPM
Price
$317.67
Change
+$0.29 (+0.09%)
Updated
Dec 12, 11:27 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
863.99B
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MUFG
Price
$15.96
Change
-$0.04 (-0.25%)
Updated
Dec 12, 12:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
177.95B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

JPM vs MUFG

Header iconJPM vs MUFG Comparison
Open Charts JPM vs MUFGBanner chart's image
JPMorgan Chase & Co
Price$317.67
Change+$0.29 (+0.09%)
Volume$5.91K
Capitalization863.99B
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$15.96
Change-$0.04 (-0.25%)
Volume$1.11K
Capitalization177.95B
JPM vs MUFG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JPM vs. MUFG commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JPM is a StrongBuy and MUFG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (JPM: $317.38 vs. MUFG: $16.00)
Brand notoriety: JPM: Notable vs. MUFG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JPM: 113% vs. MUFG: 71%
Market capitalization -- JPM: $863.99B vs. MUFG: $177.95B
JPM [@Major Banks] is valued at $863.99B. MUFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $177.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $863.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $142.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JPM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMUFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • JPM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MUFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both JPM and MUFG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JPM’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUFG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JPM’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MUFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JPM is a better buy in the short-term than MUFG.

Price Growth

JPM (@Major Banks) experienced а +0.40% price change this week, while MUFG (@Major Banks) price change was -0.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

JPM is expected to report earnings on Jan 13, 2026.

MUFG is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.21% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JPM($864B) has a higher market cap than MUFG($178B). JPM (15.72) and MUFG (15.14) have similar P/E ratio . MUFG (36.519) and JPM (35.205) have similar YTD gains . JPM has less debt than MUFG: JPM (485B) vs MUFG (46.25T). MUFG has higher revenues than JPM: MUFG (6.72T) vs JPM (175B).
JPMMUFGJPM / MUFG
Capitalization864B178B485%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD35.20536.51996%
P/E Ratio15.7215.14104%
Revenue175B6.72T3%
Total Cash23.8BN/A-
Total Debt485B46.25T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JPM vs MUFG: Fundamental Ratings
JPM
MUFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7315
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
911
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2821
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MUFG's Valuation (77) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (87). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (11). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (1). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (49). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (28). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JPMMUFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JPM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MUFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USML42.22N/A
N/A
ETRACS 2x Lvrgd MSCI US Mn Vl Fct TR ETN
MICFF5.40N/A
N/A
Mint Income Fund
GTIP49.38-0.06
-0.13%
Goldman Sachs Acs Infl Protd USD Bd ETF
TQQQ56.11-0.54
-0.95%
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
NIE25.19-0.56
-2.17%
Virtus Equity & Convertible Income Fund

JPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPM has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JPM jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JPM
1D Price
Change %
JPM100%
+2.34%
BAC - JPM
82%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
C - JPM
80%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
WFC - JPM
75%
Closely correlated
+2.10%
BK - JPM
71%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
BCS - JPM
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
More

MUFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUFG has been closely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUFG jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUFG
1D Price
Change %
MUFG100%
+0.95%
SMFG - MUFG
83%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
BCS - MUFG
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
HSBC - MUFG
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
C - MUFG
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
UBS - MUFG
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.57%
More