JPHLF
Price
$9.21
Change
-$0.11 (-1.18%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
30.84B
MDIBF
Price
$23.05
Change
-$1.15 (-4.75%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
18.22B
Interact to see
Advertisement

JPHLF vs MDIBF

Header iconJPHLF vs MDIBF Comparison
Open Charts JPHLF vs MDIBFBanner chart's image
JAPAN POST
Price$9.21
Change-$0.11 (-1.18%)
Volume$2.9K
Capitalization30.84B
MedioBanca SpA
Price$23.05
Change-$1.15 (-4.75%)
Volume$1.07K
Capitalization18.22B
JPHLF vs MDIBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JPHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MDIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JPHLF vs. MDIBF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JPHLF is a Hold and MDIBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (JPHLF: $9.21 vs. MDIBF: $23.05)
Brand notoriety: JPHLF and MDIBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JPHLF: 105% vs. MDIBF: 158%
Market capitalization -- JPHLF: $30.84B vs. MDIBF: $18.22B
JPHLF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $30.84B. MDIBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $18.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JPHLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMDIBF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • JPHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MDIBF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, MDIBF is a better buy in the long-term than JPHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JPHLF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDIBF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JPHLF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MDIBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JPHLF is a better buy in the short-term than MDIBF.

Price Growth

JPHLF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MDIBF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JPHLF($30.8B) has a higher market cap than MDIBF($18.2B). MDIBF has higher P/E ratio than JPHLF: MDIBF (12.05) vs JPHLF (11.43). MDIBF YTD gains are higher at: 44.514 vs. JPHLF (-2.643). MDIBF has less debt than JPHLF: MDIBF (34.2B) vs JPHLF (3.07T). JPHLF has higher revenues than MDIBF: JPHLF (11.88T) vs MDIBF (3.37B).
JPHLFMDIBFJPHLF / MDIBF
Capitalization30.8B18.2B169%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.64344.514-6%
P/E Ratio11.4312.0595%
Revenue11.88T3.37B352,927%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.07T34.2B8,982%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JPHLF vs MDIBF: Fundamental Ratings
JPHLF
MDIBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10013
SMR RATING
1..100
10010
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7442
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6925
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4125

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JPHLF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as MDIBF (33). This means that JPHLF’s stock grew similarly to MDIBF’s over the last 12 months.

MDIBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JPHLF (100). This means that MDIBF’s stock grew significantly faster than JPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

MDIBF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JPHLF (100). This means that MDIBF’s stock grew significantly faster than JPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

MDIBF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as JPHLF (74). This means that MDIBF’s stock grew similarly to JPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

MDIBF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JPHLF (69). This means that MDIBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JPHLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JPHLFMDIBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JPHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MDIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SXC7.880.27
+3.55%
Suncoke Energy
MATH3.280.05
+1.55%
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited
SBAC197.742.57
+1.32%
SBA Communications Corp
JTAI3.15N/A
N/A
Jet.AI Inc
SRRK31.41-1.03
-3.18%
Scholar Rock Holding Corp

JPHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPHLF has been loosely correlated with JPSTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JPHLF jumps, then JPSTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JPHLF
1D Price
Change %
JPHLF100%
N/A
JPSTF - JPHLF
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LSFG - JPHLF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MDIBF - JPHLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWBK - JPHLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GVFF - JPHLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MDIBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDIBF has been loosely correlated with LSFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDIBF jumps, then LSFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDIBF
1D Price
Change %
MDIBF100%
N/A
LSFG - MDIBF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BNKHF - MDIBF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JPHLF - MDIBF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBK - MDIBF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVKEF - MDIBF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More