Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JOEMX vs RNWHX
JOEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts JOEMX vs RNWHX
JOHCM Emerging Markets Opps Instl
Price$16.34
Change-$0.14 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.08
Change-$0.45 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
JOEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JOEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JOEMX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. JOEMX (1.57B). JOEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: JOEMX (2.79) vs RNWHX (1.25). JOEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: JOEMX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). JOEMX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. JOEMX (14.12). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than JOEMX: RNWHX (250) vs JOEMX (100000). JOEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.25 vs. RNWHX (27.68). JOEMX return over 5 years is better than : 35.57 vs. RNWHX (11.69).
| JOEMX | RNWHX | JOEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.72 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.72 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.451 | 6.092 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.57B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 1.25 | 223% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.25 | 27.68 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.80 | 43.24 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.57 | 11.69 | 304% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.43 | 124.21 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement