JNPKF
Price
$21.80
Change
-$0.14 (-0.64%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
1.33B
KGBLY
Price
$15.31
Change
-$15.30 (-49.98%)
Updated
Apr 22 closing price
Capitalization
4.96B
Interact to see
Advertisement

JNPKF vs KGBLY

Header iconJNPKF vs KGBLY Comparison
Open Charts JNPKF vs KGBLYBanner chart's image
Jenoptik AG
Price$21.80
Change-$0.14 (-0.64%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.33B
Kingboard Laminates Holdings
Price$15.31
Change-$15.30 (-49.98%)
Volume$2.79K
Capitalization4.96B
JNPKF vs KGBLY Comparison Chart in %
JNPKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JNPKF vs. KGBLY commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JNPKF is a Buy and KGBLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (JNPKF: $21.80 vs. KGBLY: $11.17)
Brand notoriety: JNPKF and KGBLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JNPKF: 103% vs. KGBLY: 100%
Market capitalization -- JNPKF: $1.33B vs. KGBLY: $4.96B
JNPKF [@Electronic Components] is valued at $1.33B. KGBLY’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $4.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $153.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $8.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JNPKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKGBLY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JNPKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KGBLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, JNPKF is a better buy in the long-term than KGBLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JNPKF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGBLY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JNPKF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KGBLY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both JNPKF and KGBLY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

JNPKF (@Electronic Components) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KGBLY (@Electronic Components) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.86%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+2.53% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGBLY($4.96B) has a higher market cap than JNPKF($1.33B). JNPKF has higher P/E ratio than KGBLY: JNPKF (14.62) vs KGBLY (11.31). JNPKF YTD gains are higher at: -13.320 vs. KGBLY (-19.378). KGBLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.94B vs. JNPKF (203M). KGBLY has higher revenues than JNPKF: KGBLY (18.5B) vs JNPKF (1.07B).
JNPKFKGBLYJNPKF / KGBLY
Capitalization1.33B4.96B27%
EBITDA203M2.94B7%
Gain YTD-13.320-19.37869%
P/E Ratio14.6211.31129%
Revenue1.07B18.5B6%
Total Cash53.2MN/A-
Total Debt445MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JNPKF vs KGBLY: Fundamental Ratings
JNPKF
KGBLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72100
SMR RATING
1..100
7795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5680
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7982
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KGBLY's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as JNPKF (12). This means that KGBLY’s stock grew similarly to JNPKF’s over the last 12 months.

JNPKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as KGBLY (100). This means that JNPKF’s stock grew similarly to KGBLY’s over the last 12 months.

JNPKF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as KGBLY (95). This means that JNPKF’s stock grew similarly to KGBLY’s over the last 12 months.

JNPKF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as KGBLY (80). This means that JNPKF’s stock grew similarly to KGBLY’s over the last 12 months.

JNPKF's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as KGBLY (82). This means that JNPKF’s stock grew similarly to KGBLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JNPKFKGBLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
8%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JNPKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JSCOX23.370.13
+0.56%
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value I
MNHIX27.010.11
+0.41%
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term I
RFNBX93.350.17
+0.18%
American Funds Fundamental Invs R2
MELAX15.94N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst EMkts Ldrs A
BDSCX19.32-0.13
-0.67%
BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Core Inv C

JNPKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JNPKF and JPDYY have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JNPKF and JPDYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JNPKF
1D Price
Change %
JNPKF100%
N/A
JPDYY - JNPKF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNNDF - JNPKF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRSEF - JNPKF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IACYF - JNPKF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBIDF - JNPKF
0%
Poorly correlated
+17.79%
More

KGBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KGBLY and IEHC have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGBLY and IEHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGBLY
1D Price
Change %
KGBLY100%
N/A
IEHC - KGBLY
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
KULR - KGBLY
1%
Poorly correlated
-5.57%
IBIDF - KGBLY
1%
Poorly correlated
+17.79%
JNPKF - KGBLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBEF - KGBLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More