Advertisement
JNDOF vs SDMHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JNDOF is a Hold and SDMHF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
JNDOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSDMHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- JNDOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SDMHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SDMHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- SDMHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
JNDOF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SDMHF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +9.57% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.10%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-0.60% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| JNDOF | SDMHF | JNDOF / SDMHF | |
| Capitalization | 1.5B | 21.1B | 7% |
| EBITDA | 13.3B | 740M | 1,797% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 14.766 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 47.34 | 82.55 | 57% |
| Revenue | 89.8B | 2.9B | 3,101% |
| Total Cash | 11.4B | 745M | 1,530% |
| Total Debt | 5.61B | 2.97B | 189% |
JNDOF | SDMHF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 93 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JNDOF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SDMHF (77). This means that JNDOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SDMHF’s over the last 12 months.
JNDOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SDMHF (100). This means that JNDOF’s stock grew similarly to SDMHF’s over the last 12 months.
JNDOF's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as SDMHF (83). This means that JNDOF’s stock grew similarly to SDMHF’s over the last 12 months.
SDMHF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as JNDOF (70). This means that SDMHF’s stock grew similarly to JNDOF’s over the last 12 months.
SDMHF's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JNDOF (98). This means that SDMHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JNDOF’s over the last 12 months.
| JNDOF | SDMHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 4% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 3% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 46% |
Advertisement
JNDOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JNDOF has been closely correlated with SGHT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JNDOF jumps, then SGHT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JNDOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JNDOF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SGHT - JNDOF | 75% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| ALGN - JNDOF | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| HYPR - JNDOF | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| ATEC - JNDOF | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.71% | ||
| SDMHF - JNDOF | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.64% | ||
More | ||||
SDMHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SDMHF has been loosely correlated with SOAGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SDMHF jumps, then SOAGY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SDMHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDMHF | 100% | +2.64% | ||
| SOAGY - SDMHF | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| SARTF - SDMHF | 41% Loosely correlated | +7.35% | ||
| RPID - SDMHF | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.69% | ||
| JNDOF - SDMHF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SRTOY - SDMHF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||