Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JNBZX vs UCMCX
JNBZX vs UCMCX Comparison
Open Charts JNBZX vs UCMCX
JPMorgan Income Builder R6
Price$10.48
Change+$0.04 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.44B
Victory Cornerstone Moderately Cnsrv
Price$12.03
Change+$0.07 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets187.09M
JNBZX vs UCMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JNBZX vs. UCMCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JNBZX is a StrongBuy and UCMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNBZX has more cash in the bank: 8.44B vs. UCMCX (187M). JNBZX pays higher dividends than UCMCX: JNBZX (5.70) vs UCMCX (1.72). JNBZX was incepted earlier than UCMCX: JNBZX (8 years) vs UCMCX (13 years). UCMCX (1.31) is less costly to investors than JNBZX (0.57). JNBZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. UCMCX (48.00). UCMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNBZX: UCMCX (500) vs JNBZX (15000000). UCMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.65 vs. JNBZX (8.89). JNBZX return over 5 years is better than : 26.74 vs. UCMCX (13.03).
| JNBZX | UCMCX | JNBZX / UCMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 1.18 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.31 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.779 | 13.049 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000000 | 500 | 3,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.44B | 187M | 4,511% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.70 | 1.72 | 332% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.89 | 9.65 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.28 | 27.55 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.74 | 13.03 | 205% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement