JMXXF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.04 (-28.57%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
295.48M
NBRFF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
7.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

JMXXF vs NBRFF

Header iconJMXXF vs NBRFF Comparison
Open Charts JMXXF vs NBRFFBanner chart's image
Jupiter Mines
Price$0.10
Change-$0.04 (-28.57%)
Volume$73K
Capitalization295.48M
CARLTON PRECIOUS
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization7.55M
JMXXF vs NBRFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JMXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JMXXF vs. NBRFF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JMXXF is a Hold and NBRFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (JMXXF: $0.10 vs. NBRFF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: JMXXF and NBRFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JMXXF: 219% vs. NBRFF: 8%
Market capitalization -- JMXXF: $295.48M vs. NBRFF: $7.55M
JMXXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $295.48M. NBRFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $7.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JMXXF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNBRFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JMXXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NBRFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, JMXXF is a better buy in the long-term than NBRFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JMXXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBRFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JMXXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • NBRFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JMXXF is a better buy in the short-term than NBRFF.

Price Growth

JMXXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NBRFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -21.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.88% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JMXXF($295M) has a higher market cap than NBRFF($7.55M). NBRFF YTD gains are higher at: 87.593 vs. JMXXF (5.000). JMXXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 42.3M vs. NBRFF (-567.25K).
JMXXFNBRFFJMXXF / NBRFF
Capitalization295M7.55M3,907%
EBITDA42.3M-567.25K-7,457%
Gain YTD5.00087.5936%
P/E Ratio7.52N/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A2.79M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JMXXF: Fundamental Ratings
JMXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
30
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
76
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
15
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JMXXFNBRFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JMXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UL61.00-0.16
-0.26%
Unilever plc
GWRS9.86-0.05
-0.55%
Global Water Resources
THG169.60-1.99
-1.16%
Hanover Insurance Group (The)
BY27.05-0.45
-1.64%
Byline Bancorp
APWC1.79-0.14
-7.47%
Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corp Ltd

JMXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JMXXF and NBRFF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JMXXF and NBRFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JMXXF
1D Price
Change %
JMXXF100%
N/A
NBRFF - JMXXF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFBOF - JMXXF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPOAF - JMXXF
9%
Poorly correlated
-4.79%
IPGDF - JMXXF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JUBPF - JMXXF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NBRFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NBRFF and DLPRF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBRFF and DLPRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBRFF
1D Price
Change %
NBRFF100%
N/A
DLPRF - NBRFF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JMXXF - NBRFF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPZRF - NBRFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLGCF - NBRFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NBYCF - NBRFF
8%
Poorly correlated
+5.12%
More