JMSB
Price
$18.85
Change
-$0.06 (-0.32%)
Updated
Aug 11, 02:07 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
270.4M
64 days until earnings call
JUVF
Price
$13.88
Change
+$0.07 (+0.51%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
69.66M
Interact to see
Advertisement

JMSB vs JUVF

Header iconJMSB vs JUVF Comparison
Open Charts JMSB vs JUVFBanner chart's image
John Marshall Ban
Price$18.85
Change-$0.06 (-0.32%)
Volume$100
Capitalization270.4M
Juniata Valley Financial
Price$13.88
Change+$0.07 (+0.51%)
Volume$100
Capitalization69.66M
JMSB vs JUVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JMSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JUVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JMSB vs. JUVF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JMSB is a Hold and JUVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (JMSB: $18.91 vs. JUVF: $13.88)
Brand notoriety: JMSB and JUVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JMSB: 20% vs. JUVF: 7%
Market capitalization -- JMSB: $269.12M vs. JUVF: $69.66M
JMSB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $269.12M. JUVF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $69.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $173.23B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JMSB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJUVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JMSB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • JUVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, JUVF is a better buy in the long-term than JMSB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JMSB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JUVF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JMSB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • JUVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JMSB is a better buy in the short-term than JUVF.

Price Growth

JMSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.66% price change this week, while JUVF (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

JMSB is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JMSB($270M) has a higher market cap than JUVF($69.7M). JMSB has higher P/E ratio than JUVF: JMSB (14.39) vs JUVF (9.91). JUVF YTD gains are higher at: 10.453 vs. JMSB (-4.303). JMSB has more cash in the bank: 10.5M vs. JUVF (5.06M). JUVF has less debt than JMSB: JUVF (32.8M) vs JMSB (85.9M).
JMSBJUVFJMSB / JUVF
Capitalization270M69.7M387%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.30310.453-41%
P/E Ratio14.399.91145%
RevenueN/A29.1M-
Total Cash10.5M5.06M207%
Total Debt85.9M32.8M262%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JMSB vs JUVF: Fundamental Ratings
JMSB
JUVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5874
SMR RATING
1..100
5950
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10037
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JUVF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JMSB (72). This means that JUVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JMSB’s over the last 12 months.

JMSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as JUVF (74). This means that JMSB’s stock grew similarly to JUVF’s over the last 12 months.

JUVF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as JMSB (59). This means that JUVF’s stock grew similarly to JMSB’s over the last 12 months.

JUVF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as JMSB (53). This means that JUVF’s stock grew similarly to JMSB’s over the last 12 months.

JUVF's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JMSB (100). This means that JUVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JMSB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JMSBJUVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JMSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JUVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGYOY4.580.20
+4.57%
MOL Magyar Olaj-Es Gazipari RT
MITSF22.130.88
+4.15%
Mitsui & Co., Ltd.
DTNOY13.54N/A
N/A
DNO ASA
CMRB4.85-0.10
-2.02%
First Commerce Bancorp Inc.
OMMSF0.04N/A
-2.22%
Omineca Mining & Metals Ltd.

JMSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JMSB has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JMSB jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JMSB
1D Price
Change %
JMSB100%
+1.29%
CTBI - JMSB
68%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
UVSP - JMSB
67%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
CNOB - JMSB
67%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
MCBS - JMSB
67%
Closely correlated
N/A
PFIS - JMSB
67%
Closely correlated
+1.48%
More

JUVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JUVF and RBKB have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JUVF and RBKB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JUVF
1D Price
Change %
JUVF100%
+0.51%
RBKB - JUVF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
SVBT - JUVF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
JMSB - JUVF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
JYSKY - JUVF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITCFY - JUVF
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.36%
More