Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JMGPX vs TRQZX
JMGPX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts JMGPX vs TRQZX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth R3
Price$47.42
Change-$6.89 (-12.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.24B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$98.26
Change-$6.13 (-5.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
JMGPX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JMGPX vs. TRQZX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JMGPX is a Hold and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. JMGPX (12.2B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than JMGPX: TRQZX (0.74) vs JMGPX (0.00). JMGPX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: JMGPX (9 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). JMGPX (1.21) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). JMGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). JMGPX (0) and TRQZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.09 vs. JMGPX (-7.04). JMGPX return over 5 years is better than : -10.51 vs. TRQZX (-13.86).
| JMGPX | TRQZX | JMGPX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.61 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.545 | -0.061 | 894% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.2B | 25.1B | 49% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.04 | -5.09 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.00 | 2.38 | 715% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.51 | -13.86 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers