Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCYX vs RWMFX
JLCYX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCYX vs RWMFX
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R2
Price$69.15
Change-$7.69 (-10.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.14B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.14
Change-$1.03 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
JLCYX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCYX vs. RWMFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCYX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. JLCYX (6.14B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCYX: RWMFX (1.45) vs JLCYX (0.09). JLCYX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCYX (14 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). JLCYX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). JLCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). JLCYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: JLCYX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. JLCYX (-4.98). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.79 vs. JLCYX (5.31).
| JLCYX | RWMFX | JLCYX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.31 | 374% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.31 | 377% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.664 | 1.520 | -109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.14B | 208B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 1.45 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.98 | 5.51 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.80 | 30.53 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.31 | 37.79 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.59 | 98.02 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement