Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCYX vs RWMFX
JLCYX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCYX vs RWMFX
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R2
Price$75.23
Change+$0.08 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.23B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.23
Change+$0.16 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
JLCYX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCYX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCYX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. JLCYX (6.23B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCYX: RWMFX (1.43) vs JLCYX (0.15). JLCYX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCYX (14 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). JLCYX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. JLCYX (19.00). JLCYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: JLCYX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. JLCYX (0.59). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.81 vs. JLCYX (32.31).
| JLCYX | RWMFX | JLCYX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.31 | 374% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.31 | 377% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.548 | 8.213 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.23B | 205B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.43 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.59 | 7.95 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.52 | 34.82 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.31 | 50.81 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.83 | 83.34 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement