Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCWX vs RWMFX
JLCWX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCWX vs RWMFX
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R6
Price$77.39
Change+$0.13 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.22B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.77
Change+$0.28 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.87B
JLCWX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCWX vs. RWMFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCWX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. JLCWX (6.22B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCWX: RWMFX (1.42) vs JLCWX (0.56). JLCWX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCWX (14 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). JLCWX (0.67) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. JLCWX (19.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JLCWX: RWMFX (250) vs JLCWX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.12 vs. JLCWX (-1.64). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.29 vs. JLCWX (36.72).
| JLCWX | RWMFX | JLCWX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.31 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.486 | 9.760 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 206B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.42 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.64 | 4.12 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.36 | 41.84 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.72 | 50.29 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.17 | 79.57 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement