Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCWX vs RWMFX
JLCWX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCWX vs RWMFX
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R6
Price$71.78
Change+$0.16 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.19B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.87
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
JLCWX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCWX vs. RWMFX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCWX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. JLCWX (6.19B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCWX: RWMFX (1.38) vs JLCWX (0.55). JLCWX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCWX (14 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). JLCWX (0.67) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. JLCWX (19.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JLCWX: RWMFX (250) vs JLCWX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.14 vs. JLCWX (-2.39). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.32 vs. JLCWX (16.68).
| JLCWX | RWMFX | JLCWX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.31 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.306 | 8.281 | -4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.19B | 209B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.38 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.39 | 6.14 | -39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.35 | 33.03 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.68 | 42.32 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.86 | 81.05 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers