Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCWX vs RWMFX
JLCWX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCWX vs RWMFX
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R6
Price$76.06
Change+$0.46 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.21B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.07
Change+$0.15 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.04B
JLCWX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCWX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCWX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. JLCWX (6.22B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCWX: RWMFX (1.43) vs JLCWX (0.57). JLCWX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCWX (14 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). JLCWX (0.67) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. JLCWX (19.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JLCWX: RWMFX (250) vs JLCWX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. JLCWX (0.96). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.81 vs. JLCWX (34.25).
| JLCWX | RWMFX | JLCWX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.31 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.639 | 8.213 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 204B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.43 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.96 | 7.95 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.60 | 34.82 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.25 | 50.81 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.33 | 83.34 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement