Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCVX vs RWMFX
JLCVX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCVX vs RWMFX
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R5
Price$79.30
Change+$0.52 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$68.38
Change+$0.31 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
JLCVX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCVX vs. RWMFX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCVX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. JLCVX (6.25B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCVX: RWMFX (1.38) vs JLCVX (0.51). JLCVX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCVX (17 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). JLCVX (0.72) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. JLCVX (19.00). JLCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: JLCVX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.42 vs. JLCVX (-3.75). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.64 vs. JLCVX (29.94).
| JLCVX | RWMFX | JLCVX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.31 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.31 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.215 | 12.407 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.25B | 209B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.38 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.75 | 5.42 | -69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.75 | 30.39 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.94 | 43.64 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.43 | 78.18 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement