Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCVX vs RWMFX
JLCVX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCVX vs RWMFX
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R5
Price$77.94
Change-$1.27 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.19B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.86
Change-$0.96 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.34B
JLCVX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCVX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCVX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. JLCVX (6.19B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCVX: RWMFX (1.41) vs JLCVX (0.51). JLCVX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCVX (16 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). JLCVX (0.72) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. JLCVX (19.00). JLCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: JLCVX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.30 vs. JLCVX (-2.38). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.43 vs. JLCVX (35.10).
| JLCVX | RWMFX | JLCVX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.31 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.31 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.090 | 11.486 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.19B | 209B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.41 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.38 | 5.30 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.54 | 32.83 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.10 | 47.43 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.77 | 82.53 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers