Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCVX vs RWMFX
JLCVX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCVX vs RWMFX
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R5
Price$70.00
Change-$7.90 (-10.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.14B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.14
Change-$1.03 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
JLCVX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCVX vs. RWMFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCVX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. JLCVX (6.14B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCVX: RWMFX (1.45) vs JLCVX (0.49). JLCVX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCVX (17 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). JLCVX (0.72) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). JLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). JLCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: JLCVX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. JLCVX (-4.47). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.79 vs. JLCVX (7.44).
| JLCVX | RWMFX | JLCVX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.31 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.31 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.616 | 1.520 | -106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.14B | 208B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.45 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.47 | 5.51 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.61 | 30.53 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.44 | 37.79 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.00 | 98.02 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement