Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCVX vs RWMFX
JLCVX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCVX vs RWMFX
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R5
Price$75.98
Change+$0.45 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.23B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.07
Change+$0.15 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
JLCVX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCVX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCVX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. JLCVX (6.23B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCVX: RWMFX (1.43) vs JLCVX (0.53). JLCVX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCVX (16 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). JLCVX (0.72) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. JLCVX (19.00). JLCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: JLCVX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. JLCVX (1.11). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.81 vs. JLCVX (34.32).
| JLCVX | RWMFX | JLCVX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.31 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.31 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.837 | 8.213 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.23B | 205B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.43 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.11 | 7.95 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.75 | 34.82 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.32 | 50.81 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.20 | 83.34 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement