Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCFX vs RWMFX
JLCFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCFX vs RWMFX
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R4
Price$76.41
Change+$0.41 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.28B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.77
Change+$0.42 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.98B
JLCFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCFX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. JLCFX (6.28B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCFX: RWMFX (1.43) vs JLCFX (0.36). JLCFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCFX (16 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). JLCFX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. JLCFX (19.00). JLCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: JLCFX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.69 vs. JLCFX (-1.54). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 57.64 vs. JLCFX (42.91).
| JLCFX | RWMFX | JLCFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.31 | 294% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.31 | 329% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.378 | 9.760 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.28B | 206B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 1.43 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.54 | 5.69 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.90 | 46.35 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.91 | 57.64 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.21 | 93.97 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement