Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLCFX vs RWMFX
JLCFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JLCFX vs RWMFX
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R4
Price$76.95
Change-$1.26 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.19B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.86
Change-$0.96 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.34B
JLCFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLCFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLCFX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. JLCFX (6.19B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JLCFX: RWMFX (1.41) vs JLCFX (0.35). JLCFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JLCFX (16 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). JLCFX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. JLCFX (19.00). JLCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: JLCFX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.30 vs. JLCFX (-2.68). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.43 vs. JLCFX (33.92).
| JLCFX | RWMFX | JLCFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.31 | 294% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.31 | 329% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.907 | 11.486 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.19B | 209B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 1.41 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.68 | 5.30 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.78 | 32.83 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.92 | 47.43 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.23 | 82.53 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers