Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JHQCX vs SNOAX
JHQCX vs SNOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHQCX vs. SNOAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHQCX is a Hold and SNOAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JHQCX has more cash in the bank: 21.4B vs. SNOAX (105M). SNOAX pays higher dividends than JHQCX: SNOAX (0.77) vs JHQCX (0.01). JHQCX was incepted earlier than SNOAX: JHQCX (12 years) vs SNOAX (20 years). SNOAX (2.06) is less costly to investors than JHQCX (1.32). SNOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. JHQCX (20.00). JHQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SNOAX: JHQCX (1000) vs SNOAX (2500). SNOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.67 vs. JHQCX (7.73). JHQCX return over 5 years is better than : 47.69 vs. SNOAX (27.94).
| JHQCX | SNOAX | JHQCX / SNOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.06 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.06 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.659 | 0.909 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.4B | 105M | 20,381% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.77 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.73 | 12.67 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.44 | 22.49 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.69 | 27.94 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.98 | 121.82 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement