Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JHQCX vs SNOAX
JHQCX vs SNOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHQCX vs. SNOAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHQCX is a Buy and SNOAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JHQCX has more cash in the bank: 21.2B vs. SNOAX (100M). SNOAX pays higher dividends than JHQCX: SNOAX (1.18) vs JHQCX (0.06). JHQCX was incepted earlier than SNOAX: JHQCX (12 years) vs SNOAX (20 years). SNOAX (2.06) is less costly to investors than JHQCX (1.33). SNOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. JHQCX (20.00). JHQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SNOAX: JHQCX (1000) vs SNOAX (2500). SNOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.04 vs. JHQCX (3.17). SNOAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.75 vs. JHQCX (47.21).
| JHQCX | SNOAX | JHQCX / SNOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 2.06 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 2.06 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.681 | 14.392 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.2B | 100M | 21,200% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 1.18 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.17 | 7.04 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.11 | 18.90 | 233% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.21 | 49.75 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.34 | 80.52 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement