Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JHMU vs JMUB
JHMU vs JMUB Comparison
Open Charts JHMU vs JMUB
JHancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF
Price$26.16
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Volume$169
Net Assets39.21M
JPMorgan Municipal ETF
Price$50.53
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Volume$3.34K
Net Assets6.25B
JHMU vs JMUB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHMU vs. JMUB commentary
Dec 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHMU is a Hold and JMUB is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JMUB has more net assets: 6.25B vs. JHMU (39.2M). JHMU has a higher annual dividend yield than JMUB: JHMU (4.185) vs JMUB (3.464). JHMU was incepted earlier than JMUB: JHMU (2 years) vs JMUB (7 years). JMUB (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than JHMU (0.39). JHMU has a higher turnover JMUB (39.00) vs JMUB (39.00).
| JHMU | JMUB | JHMU / JMUB | |
| Gain YTD | 4.185 | 3.464 | 121% |
| Net Assets | 39.2M | 6.25B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.18 | 217% |
| Turnover | 83.00 | 39.00 | 213% |
| Yield | 5.08 | 3.39 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| JHMU | JMUB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 27% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 33% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 58% | 22 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
JHMU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that JHMU and NEE have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JHMU and NEE's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JHMU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JHMU | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| NEE - JHMU | 1% Poorly correlated | -1.84% | ||
| AEE - JHMU | 0% Poorly correlated | -0.61% | ||
| FE - JHMU | -0% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
| AWK - JHMU | -1% Poorly correlated | -1.56% | ||
| UGI - JHMU | -2% Poorly correlated | -0.64% | ||
More | ||||
JMUB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that JMUB and RTX have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JMUB and RTX's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JMUB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JMUB | 100% | +0.03% | ||
| RTX - JMUB | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.70% | ||
| PLUS - JMUB | 2% Poorly correlated | +2.82% |