JHIUF
Price
$27.36
Change
+$0.72 (+2.70%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
16.79B
TGAFF
Price
$1.00
Change
-$1.44 (-59.02%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
262.92M
Interact to see
Advertisement

JHIUF vs TGAFF

Header iconJHIUF vs TGAFF Comparison
Open Charts JHIUF vs TGAFFBanner chart's image
James Hardie Industries
Price$27.36
Change+$0.72 (+2.70%)
Volume$82.84K
Capitalization16.79B
Taiga Building Products
Price$1.00
Change-$1.44 (-59.02%)
Volume$405
Capitalization262.92M
JHIUF vs TGAFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JHIUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGAFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JHIUF vs. TGAFF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHIUF is a Buy and TGAFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (JHIUF: $27.36 vs. TGAFF: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: JHIUF and TGAFF are both not notable
JHIUF represents the Construction Materials, while TGAFF is part of the Electronics Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JHIUF: 156% vs. TGAFF: 70%
Market capitalization -- JHIUF: $16.79B vs. TGAFF: $262.92M
JHIUF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $16.79B. TGAFF’s [@Electronics Distributors] market capitalization is $262.92M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $74.49B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics Distributors] industry ranges from $56.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $10.15B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics Distributors] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JHIUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTGAFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • JHIUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TGAFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, JHIUF is a better buy in the long-term than TGAFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JHIUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGAFF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JHIUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TGAFF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JHIUF is a better buy in the short-term than TGAFF.

Price Growth

JHIUF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TGAFF (@Electronics Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.16%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics Distributors industry was +1.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+0.43% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

@Electronics Distributors (+1.56% weekly)

Electronics distributors are companies that are involved in distribution of one or more of the following: electronic components, computer products/ peripherals and software products & services. Several electronics distributors are also becoming the point of contact for technical/pre- & post-sale support in many cases, in an attempt to bolster their position in the market. Tariffs and/or cross-border trade barriers are some of the potential threats to the electronics supply chain, but that could also potentially lead to re-directing to markets where tariffs/restrictions are lower depending on demand. The industry is also vulnerable in the event of economic slowdowns. Arrow Electronics, Inc., SYNNEX Corporation and Versum Materials, Inc. are some of the major electronics distributors in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JHIUF($16.8B) has a higher market cap than TGAFF($263M). JHIUF has higher P/E ratio than TGAFF: JHIUF (27.92) vs TGAFF (3.27). JHIUF YTD gains are higher at: -2.412 vs. TGAFF (-63.899). JHIUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 903M vs. TGAFF (81.4M). JHIUF has more cash in the bank: 563M vs. TGAFF (119M). TGAFF has less debt than JHIUF: TGAFF (96.3M) vs JHIUF (1.21B). JHIUF has higher revenues than TGAFF: JHIUF (3.88B) vs TGAFF (1.64B).
JHIUFTGAFFJHIUF / TGAFF
Capitalization16.8B263M6,388%
EBITDA903M81.4M1,109%
Gain YTD-2.412-63.8994%
P/E Ratio27.923.27853%
Revenue3.88B1.64B236%
Total Cash563M119M473%
Total Debt1.21B96.3M1,251%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JHIUF vs TGAFF: Fundamental Ratings
JHIUF
TGAFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5098
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5687
SMR RATING
1..100
4369
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5498
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4996
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JHIUF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as TGAFF (46). This means that JHIUF’s stock grew similarly to TGAFF’s over the last 12 months.

JHIUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as TGAFF (87). This means that JHIUF’s stock grew similarly to TGAFF’s over the last 12 months.

JHIUF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as TGAFF (69). This means that JHIUF’s stock grew similarly to TGAFF’s over the last 12 months.

JHIUF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGAFF (98). This means that JHIUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGAFF’s over the last 12 months.

JHIUF's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGAFF (96). This means that JHIUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGAFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JHIUFTGAFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JHIUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGAFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OAYLX81.980.07
+0.09%
Oakmark Select Advisor
NWFAX34.83-0.05
-0.14%
Nationwide A
GGRAX11.77-0.03
-0.25%
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth A
TASMX29.02-0.14
-0.48%
Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value R6
WPLCX16.90-0.15
-0.88%
WP Large Cap Income Plus Institutional

JHIUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JHIUF and FRCEF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JHIUF and FRCEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JHIUF
1D Price
Change %
JHIUF100%
N/A
FRCEF - JHIUF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYCF - JHIUF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCEM - JHIUF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.82%
THYCY - JHIUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMID - JHIUF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
More

TGAFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TGAFF and IMYSF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TGAFF and IMYSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGAFF
1D Price
Change %
TGAFF100%
N/A
IMYSF - TGAFF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYCY - TGAFF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JHIUF - TGAFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBJHF - TGAFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPCLY - TGAFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More