JHIUF
Price
$19.70
Change
-$0.96 (-4.65%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
11.71B
SMID
Price
$42.02
Change
+$0.22 (+0.53%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
221.73M
Interact to see
Advertisement

JHIUF vs SMID

Header iconJHIUF vs SMID Comparison
Open Charts JHIUF vs SMIDBanner chart's image
James Hardie Industries
Price$19.70
Change-$0.96 (-4.65%)
Volume$6.17K
Capitalization11.71B
Smith-Midland
Price$42.02
Change+$0.22 (+0.53%)
Volume$253
Capitalization221.73M
JHIUF vs SMID Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JHIUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JHIUF vs. SMID commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHIUF is a Hold and SMID is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (JHIUF: $19.70 vs. SMID: $41.80)
Brand notoriety: JHIUF and SMID are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JHIUF: 9% vs. SMID: 58%
Market capitalization -- JHIUF: $11.71B vs. SMID: $221.73M
JHIUF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $11.71B. SMID’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $221.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $75.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JHIUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMID’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • JHIUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMID’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMID is a better buy in the long-term than JHIUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JHIUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMID’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JHIUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMID’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JHIUF is a better buy in the short-term than SMID.

Price Growth

JHIUF (@Construction Materials) experienced а -4.62% price change this week, while SMID (@Construction Materials) price change was -3.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.43% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JHIUF($11.7B) has a higher market cap than SMID($222M). JHIUF has higher P/E ratio than SMID: JHIUF (25.58) vs SMID (18.41). SMID YTD gains are higher at: -5.983 vs. JHIUF (-29.743). JHIUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 903M vs. SMID (18.4M). JHIUF has more cash in the bank: 563M vs. SMID (7.1M). SMID has less debt than JHIUF: SMID (4.86M) vs JHIUF (1.21B). JHIUF has higher revenues than SMID: JHIUF (3.88B) vs SMID (91M).
JHIUFSMIDJHIUF / SMID
Capitalization11.7B222M5,270%
EBITDA903M18.4M4,908%
Gain YTD-29.743-5.983497%
P/E Ratio25.5818.41139%
Revenue3.88B91M4,260%
Total Cash563M7.1M7,928%
Total Debt1.21B4.86M24,784%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JHIUF vs SMID: Fundamental Ratings
JHIUF
SMID
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7343
SMR RATING
1..100
4334
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9241
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6093
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JHIUF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (72). This means that JHIUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as JHIUF (73). This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to JHIUF’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as JHIUF (43). This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to JHIUF’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JHIUF (92). This means that SMID’s stock grew somewhat faster than JHIUF’s over the last 12 months.

JHIUF's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (93). This means that JHIUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JHIUFSMID
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
10%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JHIUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OMRNF26.600.08
+0.30%
OMRON Corp.
MBHCF1.00N/A
N/A
MBH Corporation PLC
FINMF57.55N/A
N/A
Leonardo S.P.A.
CGROF3.26N/A
N/A
Character Group PLC
SFRGY2.70-0.09
-3.23%
Salvatore Ferragamo S.P.A.

JHIUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JHIUF and FRCEF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JHIUF and FRCEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JHIUF
1D Price
Change %
JHIUF100%
-4.62%
FRCEF - JHIUF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYCF - JHIUF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCEM - JHIUF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
THYCY - JHIUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMID - JHIUF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
More

SMID and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMID has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMID jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMID
1D Price
Change %
SMID100%
+1.06%
BCC - SMID
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.20%
USLM - SMID
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
KNF - SMID
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
EXP - SMID
44%
Loosely correlated
+4.14%
CRH - SMID
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
More