Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JHBCX vs RGACX
JHBCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts JHBCX vs RGACX
JHancock Blue Chip Growth NAV
Price$63.57
Change-$8.19 (-11.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$76.64
Change-$9.33 (-10.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
JHBCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHBCX vs. RGACX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHBCX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. JHBCX (5.82B). JHBCX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . JHBCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: JHBCX (20 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than JHBCX (0.76). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. JHBCX (29.00). JHBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: JHBCX (0) vs RGACX (250). JHBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.43 vs. RGACX (2.06). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 11.01 vs. JHBCX (8.72).
| JHBCX | RGACX | JHBCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.93 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.93 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.638 | -1.046 | 348% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.82B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.43 | 2.06 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.25 | 42.58 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.72 | 11.01 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.74 | 113.97 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers