Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JHBCX vs RGACX
JHBCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts JHBCX vs RGACX
JHancock Blue Chip Growth NAV
Price$68.84
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.91B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
JHBCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHBCX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHBCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. JHBCX (5.91B). RGACX pays higher dividends than JHBCX: RGACX (0.07) vs JHBCX (0.00). JHBCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: JHBCX (20 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than JHBCX (0.77). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. JHBCX (12.00). JHBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: JHBCX (0) vs RGACX (250). JHBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.60 vs. RGACX (14.08). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. JHBCX (30.01).
| JHBCX | RGACX | JHBCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.94 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.94 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.112 | 14.044 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.91B | 329B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.60 | 14.08 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.50 | 41.19 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.01 | 41.95 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.78 | 83.68 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers