Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JHBCX vs RGACX
JHBCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts JHBCX vs RGACX
JHancock Blue Chip Growth NAV
Price$66.88
Change+$0.14 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.06B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.34
Change+$0.23 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
JHBCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHBCX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHBCX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. JHBCX (6.06B). RGACX pays higher dividends than JHBCX: RGACX (0.07) vs JHBCX (0.00). JHBCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: JHBCX (20 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than JHBCX (0.75). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. JHBCX (29.00). JHBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: JHBCX (0) vs RGACX (250). JHBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.82 vs. RGACX (5.45). JHBCX (20.70) and RGACX (20.43) have equivalent 5 years return.
| JHBCX | RGACX | JHBCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.93 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.93 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.892 | 8.821 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.06B | 339B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.82 | 5.45 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 102.42 | 63.36 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.70 | 20.43 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.79 | 92.34 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement