Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JHBCX vs RGACX
JHBCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts JHBCX vs RGACX
JHancock Blue Chip Growth NAV
Price$70.29
Change+$0.25 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.99B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
JHBCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JHBCX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JHBCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. JHBCX (5.99B). RGACX pays higher dividends than JHBCX: RGACX (0.07) vs JHBCX (0.00). JHBCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: JHBCX (20 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than JHBCX (0.75). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. JHBCX (12.00). JHBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: JHBCX (0) vs RGACX (250). JHBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.83 vs. RGACX (11.01). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. JHBCX (24.30).
| JHBCX | RGACX | JHBCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.94 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.94 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.495 | 17.655 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.99B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.83 | 11.01 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 95.52 | 70.57 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.30 | 37.85 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.19 | 96.78 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement