JGLDF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
24.26M
KDKGF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
18.29M
Interact to see
Advertisement

JGLDF vs KDKGF

Header iconJGLDF vs KDKGF Comparison
Open Charts JGLDF vs KDKGFBanner chart's image
JAPAN GOLD
Price$0.09
Change+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Volume$33.29K
Capitalization24.26M
Klondike Gold
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.74K
Capitalization18.29M
JGLDF vs KDKGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KDKGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JGLDF vs. KDKGF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JGLDF is a Hold and KDKGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (JGLDF: $0.09 vs. KDKGF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: JGLDF and KDKGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JGLDF: 46% vs. KDKGF: 25%
Market capitalization -- JGLDF: $24.26M vs. KDKGF: $18.32M
JGLDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $24.26M. KDKGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $18.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JGLDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKDKGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JGLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KDKGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both JGLDF and KDKGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JGLDF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KDKGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JGLDF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KDKGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JGLDF is a better buy in the short-term than KDKGF.

Price Growth

JGLDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +6.77% price change this week, while KDKGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4862.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.88% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JGLDF($24.3M) has a higher market cap than KDKGF($18.3M). JGLDF YTD gains are higher at: 92.889 vs. KDKGF (44.747). KDKGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -903.42K vs. JGLDF (-4.69M). JGLDF has more cash in the bank: 5.84M vs. KDKGF (953K). KDKGF has less debt than JGLDF: KDKGF (41.1K) vs JGLDF (1.7M). JGLDF (0) and KDKGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
JGLDFKDKGFJGLDF / KDKGF
Capitalization24.3M18.3M133%
EBITDA-4.69M-903.42K519%
Gain YTD92.88944.747208%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash5.84M953K612%
Total Debt1.7M41.1K4,124%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JGLDF vs KDKGF: Fundamental Ratings
JGLDF
KDKGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
264
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9693
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KDKGF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as JGLDF (36). This means that KDKGF’s stock grew similarly to JGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

KDKGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as JGLDF (100). This means that KDKGF’s stock grew similarly to JGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

KDKGF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as JGLDF (96). This means that KDKGF’s stock grew similarly to JGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

JGLDF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as KDKGF (43). This means that JGLDF’s stock grew similarly to KDKGF’s over the last 12 months.

JGLDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KDKGF (100). This means that JGLDF’s stock grew similarly to KDKGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JGLDFKDKGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KDKGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THSGF1.060.02
+1.83%
THESIS GOLD INC.
BYDIF5.19N/A
N/A
Byd Electronic International Co Ltd.
MCARY7.98-0.17
-2.09%
Mercari Inc.
CSDX0.19N/A
-2.50%
CS Diagnostics Corp.
NXUR0.10-0.01
-7.59%
Nxu Inc.

JGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JGLDF and KDKGF have been poorly correlated (+-1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JGLDF and KDKGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JGLDF
1D Price
Change %
JGLDF100%
+8.50%
KDKGF - JGLDF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+3.60%
JUPGF - JGLDF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-11.27%
IRVRF - JGLDF
-5%
Poorly correlated
+10.39%
KGLDF - JGLDF
-6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JAGGF - JGLDF
-12%
Poorly correlated
+5.06%

KDKGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KDKGF and APRAF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KDKGF and APRAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KDKGF
1D Price
Change %
KDKGF100%
+3.60%
APRAF - KDKGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IRVRF - KDKGF
15%
Poorly correlated
+10.39%
JAGGF - KDKGF
8%
Poorly correlated
+5.06%
JUPGF - KDKGF
6%
Poorly correlated
-11.27%
KGLDF - KDKGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More