JGLDF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
27.1M
JINFF
Price
$9.08
Change
+$0.26 (+2.95%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.58B
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

JGLDF vs JINFF

Header iconJGLDF vs JINFF Comparison
Open Charts JGLDF vs JINFFBanner chart's image
JAPAN GOLD
Price$0.06
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization27.1M
China Gold International Resources
Price$9.08
Change+$0.26 (+2.95%)
Volume$5.05K
Capitalization1.58B
JGLDF vs JINFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JINFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JGLDF vs. JINFF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JGLDF is a Hold and JINFF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (JGLDF: $0.06 vs. JINFF: $9.08)
Brand notoriety: JGLDF and JINFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JGLDF: 9% vs. JINFF: 85%
Market capitalization -- JGLDF: $27.1M vs. JINFF: $1.58B
JGLDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $27.1M. JINFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JGLDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJINFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • JGLDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JINFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, JINFF is a better buy in the long-term than JGLDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JGLDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JINFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JGLDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • JINFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both JGLDF and JINFF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

JGLDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.86% price change this week, while JINFF (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

JINFF is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JINFF($1.58B) has a higher market cap than JGLDF($27.1M). JINFF YTD gains are higher at: 76.732 vs. JGLDF (42.222). JINFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 303M vs. JGLDF (-3.87M). JINFF has more cash in the bank: 553M vs. JGLDF (428K). JGLDF has less debt than JINFF: JGLDF (0) vs JINFF (845M). JINFF has higher revenues than JGLDF: JINFF (1.05B) vs JGLDF (0).
JGLDFJINFFJGLDF / JINFF
Capitalization27.1M1.58B2%
EBITDA-3.87M303M-1%
Gain YTD42.22276.73255%
P/E RatioN/A6.92-
Revenue01.05B-
Total Cash428K553M0%
Total Debt0845M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JGLDF vs JINFF: Fundamental Ratings
JGLDF
JINFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10011
SMR RATING
1..100
9469
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6437
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10095
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JINFF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as JGLDF (32). This means that JINFF’s stock grew similarly to JGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

JINFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JGLDF (100). This means that JINFF’s stock grew significantly faster than JGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

JINFF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as JGLDF (94). This means that JINFF’s stock grew similarly to JGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

JINFF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as JGLDF (64). This means that JINFF’s stock grew similarly to JGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

JINFF's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as JGLDF (100). This means that JINFF’s stock grew similarly to JGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JGLDFJINFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JINFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FWAFX35.710.19
+0.53%
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
TSLIX4.900.01
+0.20%
Transamerica Small Cap Value I
EICCX17.720.03
+0.17%
EIC Value C
DFCEX26.260.04
+0.14%
DFA Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 I
MVTIX11.05N/A
N/A
Transamerica Mid Cap Value Opps I

JGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JGLDF and HAMRF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JGLDF and HAMRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JGLDF
1D Price
Change %
JGLDF100%
-13.28%
HAMRF - JGLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JINFF - JGLDF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.95%
ISVLF - JGLDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-4.54%
KDKGF - JGLDF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
JUPGF - JGLDF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+111.76%
More

JINFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JINFF and ZIJMF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JINFF and ZIJMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JINFF
1D Price
Change %
JINFF100%
+2.95%
ZIJMF - JINFF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
CGLCF - JINFF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.70%
CAHPF - JINFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
CHPGF - JINFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-11.26%
SMAGF - JINFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.21%
More