JGCCY
Price
$18.12
Change
-$0.18 (-0.98%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
2.41B
KLRGF
Price
$17.75
Change
+$0.25 (+1.43%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.23B
Interact to see
Advertisement

JGCCY vs KLRGF

Header iconJGCCY vs KLRGF Comparison
Open Charts JGCCY vs KLRGFBanner chart's image
JGC Holdings
Price$18.12
Change-$0.18 (-0.98%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.41B
Keller Group
Price$17.75
Change+$0.25 (+1.43%)
Volume$2.81K
Capitalization1.23B
JGCCY vs KLRGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JGCCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KLRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JGCCY vs. KLRGF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JGCCY is a Hold and KLRGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (JGCCY: $18.12 vs. KLRGF: $17.75)
Brand notoriety: JGCCY and KLRGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JGCCY: 73% vs. KLRGF: 270%
Market capitalization -- JGCCY: $2.41B vs. KLRGF: $1.23B
JGCCY [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $2.41B. KLRGF’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $1.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.31T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JGCCY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKLRGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • JGCCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KLRGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KLRGF is a better buy in the long-term than JGCCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JGCCY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KLRGF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JGCCY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KLRGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JGCCY is a better buy in the short-term than KLRGF.

Price Growth

JGCCY (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KLRGF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -10.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +203.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-0.42% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JGCCY($2.41B) has a higher market cap than KLRGF($1.23B). JGCCY has higher P/E ratio than KLRGF: JGCCY (18.46) vs KLRGF (6.94). JGCCY YTD gains are higher at: 17.892 vs. KLRGF (-4.417). JGCCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.5B vs. KLRGF (314M). JGCCY has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. KLRGF (157M). KLRGF has less debt than JGCCY: KLRGF (310M) vs JGCCY (34.7B). JGCCY has higher revenues than KLRGF: JGCCY (836B) vs KLRGF (2.96B).
JGCCYKLRGFJGCCY / KLRGF
Capitalization2.41B1.23B197%
EBITDA8.5B314M2,707%
Gain YTD17.892-4.417-405%
P/E Ratio18.466.94266%
Revenue836B2.96B28,291%
Total Cash357B157M227,389%
Total Debt34.7B310M11,194%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JGCCY vs KLRGF: Fundamental Ratings
JGCCY
KLRGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3294
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10029
SMR RATING
1..100
442
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5163
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2369
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KLRGF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JGCCY (59). This means that KLRGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JGCCY’s over the last 12 months.

KLRGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JGCCY (100). This means that KLRGF’s stock grew significantly faster than JGCCY’s over the last 12 months.

JGCCY's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KLRGF (42). This means that JGCCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than KLRGF’s over the last 12 months.

JGCCY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as KLRGF (63). This means that JGCCY’s stock grew similarly to KLRGF’s over the last 12 months.

JGCCY's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KLRGF (69). This means that JGCCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than KLRGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JGCCYKLRGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JGCCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KLRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RVVHX10.900.21
+1.96%
Royce Small-Cap Value Investment
RSLCX69.540.67
+0.97%
American Funds SMALLCAP World R3
AOBLX12.030.09
+0.75%
Victory Pioneer Balanced A
MNCEX13.000.06
+0.46%
Mercer Non-US Core Equity Y3
NRICX22.360.06
+0.27%
Nuveen Real Asset Income C

JGCCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JGCCY and YITYY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JGCCY and YITYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JGCCY
1D Price
Change %
JGCCY100%
N/A
YITYY - JGCCY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JGCCF - JGCCY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KLRGF - JGCCY
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
HOCFF - JGCCY
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
EFGSY - JGCCY
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
More

KLRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KLRGF and AEGXF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KLRGF and AEGXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KLRGF
1D Price
Change %
KLRGF100%
+1.43%
AEGXF - KLRGF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
JGCCY - KLRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BFLBY - KLRGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KIERF - KLRGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KAJMY - KLRGF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More