JGCCY
Price
$15.91
Change
-$1.15 (-6.74%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.06B
KLRGF
Price
$19.83
Change
-$1.18 (-5.62%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.39B
Interact to see
Advertisement

JGCCY vs KLRGF

Header iconJGCCY vs KLRGF Comparison
Open Charts JGCCY vs KLRGFBanner chart's image
JGC Holdings
Price$15.91
Change-$1.15 (-6.74%)
Volume$367
Capitalization2.06B
Keller Group
Price$19.83
Change-$1.18 (-5.62%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization1.39B
JGCCY vs KLRGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JGCCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KLRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JGCCY vs. KLRGF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JGCCY is a Buy and KLRGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (JGCCY: $15.91 vs. KLRGF: $19.83)
Brand notoriety: JGCCY and KLRGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JGCCY: 100% vs. KLRGF: 151%
Market capitalization -- JGCCY: $2.06B vs. KLRGF: $1.39B
JGCCY [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $2.06B. KLRGF’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $1.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.31T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JGCCY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKLRGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • JGCCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KLRGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both JGCCY and KLRGF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JGCCY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KLRGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JGCCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • KLRGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JGCCY is a better buy in the short-term than KLRGF.

Price Growth

JGCCY (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KLRGF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +27.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +200.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +154.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+27.60% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JGCCY($2.06B) has a higher market cap than KLRGF($1.39B). JGCCY has higher P/E ratio than KLRGF: JGCCY (18.46) vs KLRGF (7.49). KLRGF YTD gains are higher at: 6.783 vs. JGCCY (3.537).
JGCCYKLRGFJGCCY / KLRGF
Capitalization2.06B1.39B148%
EBITDA8.5BN/A-
Gain YTD3.5376.78352%
P/E Ratio18.467.49246%
Revenue836BN/A-
Total Cash357BN/A-
Total Debt34.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JGCCY vs KLRGF: Fundamental Ratings
JGCCY
KLRGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10019
SMR RATING
1..100
359
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5752
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2085
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KLRGF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JGCCY (61). This means that KLRGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JGCCY’s over the last 12 months.

KLRGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JGCCY (100). This means that KLRGF’s stock grew significantly faster than JGCCY’s over the last 12 months.

JGCCY's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KLRGF (59). This means that JGCCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than KLRGF’s over the last 12 months.

KLRGF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as JGCCY (57). This means that KLRGF’s stock grew similarly to JGCCY’s over the last 12 months.

JGCCY's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KLRGF (85). This means that JGCCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than KLRGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JGCCYKLRGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
15%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JGCCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KLRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TROCX31.080.44
+1.44%
Touchstone Non-US Equity I
AULGX101.900.95
+0.94%
American Century Ultra® R5
GCEAX18.840.12
+0.64%
AB Global Core Equity A
AISZX16.83-0.02
-0.12%
Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Z-2
KMKNX80.67-0.66
-0.81%
Kinetics Market Opportunities No Load

JGCCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JGCCY and YITYY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JGCCY and YITYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JGCCY
1D Price
Change %
JGCCY100%
N/A
YITYY - JGCCY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JGCCF - JGCCY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KLRGF - JGCCY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HOCFF - JGCCY
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
EFGSY - JGCCY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KLRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KLRGF and AEGXF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KLRGF and AEGXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KLRGF
1D Price
Change %
KLRGF100%
N/A
AEGXF - KLRGF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
JGCCY - KLRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BFLBY - KLRGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KIERF - KLRGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KAJMY - KLRGF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More