Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JFLJX vs NADCX
JFLJX vs NADCX Comparison
Open Charts JFLJX vs NADCX
JPMorgan Investor Conservative Growth R6
Price$13.31
Change-$0.08 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.23B
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Cnsrv A
Price$10.15
Change-$0.07 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets217.98M
JFLJX vs NADCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JFLJX vs. NADCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFLJX is a Hold and NADCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JFLJX has more cash in the bank: 4.23B vs. NADCX (218M). JFLJX pays higher dividends than NADCX: JFLJX (3.65) vs NADCX (3.04). JFLJX was incepted earlier than NADCX: JFLJX (8 years) vs NADCX (26 years). NADCX (0.83) is less costly to investors than JFLJX (0.44). NADCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.30 vs. JFLJX (11.00). NADCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFLJX: NADCX (2000) vs JFLJX (15000000). JFLJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.41 vs. NADCX (2.12). JFLJX return over 5 years is better than : 15.22 vs. NADCX (13.64).
| JFLJX | NADCX | JFLJX / NADCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.83 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.83 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.875 | 9.678 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000000 | 2000 | 750,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.23B | 218M | 1,941% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.65 | 3.04 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.41 | 2.12 | 349% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.89 | 19.08 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.22 | 13.64 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 25.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement