JFBR
Price
$6.37
Change
+$0.16 (+2.58%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
3.53M
QVCGA
Price
$4.16
Change
+$0.74 (+21.64%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
38.64M
Interact to see
Advertisement

JFBR vs QVCGA

Header iconJFBR vs QVCGA Comparison
Open Charts JFBR vs QVCGABanner chart's image
Jeffs Brands
Price$6.37
Change+$0.16 (+2.58%)
Volume$119.1K
Capitalization3.53M
QVC Group
Price$4.16
Change+$0.74 (+21.64%)
Volume$402.1K
Capitalization38.64M
JFBR vs QVCGA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JFBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QVCGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JFBR vs. QVCGA commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFBR is a Hold and QVCGA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (JFBR: $6.37 vs. QVCGA: $4.16)
Brand notoriety: JFBR and QVCGA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JFBR: 57% vs. QVCGA: 96%
Market capitalization -- JFBR: $3.53M vs. QVCGA: $38.64M
JFBR [@Internet Retail] is valued at $3.53M. QVCGA’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $38.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.37T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $49.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JFBR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQVCGA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • JFBR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QVCGA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QVCGA is a better buy in the long-term than JFBR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JFBR’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QVCGA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JFBR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QVCGA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QVCGA is a better buy in the short-term than JFBR.

Price Growth

JFBR (@Internet Retail) experienced а +0.31% price change this week, while QVCGA (@Internet Retail) price change was +21.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +139.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+1.10% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QVCGA($38.6M) has a higher market cap than JFBR($3.53M). QVCGA YTD gains are higher at: -74.788 vs. JFBR (-85.420). JFBR has less debt than QVCGA: JFBR (288K) vs QVCGA (5.59B).
JFBRQVCGAJFBR / QVCGA
Capitalization3.53M38.6M9%
EBITDAN/A-576M-
Gain YTD-85.420-74.788114%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A9.8B-
Total CashN/A833M-
Total Debt288K5.59B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QVCGA: Fundamental Ratings
QVCGA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JFBRQVCGA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JFBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QVCGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHW97.081.36
+1.42%
Charles Schwab Corp (The)
AHCO9.19-0.09
-0.97%
AdaptHealth Corp
ISPO3.03-0.05
-1.62%
Inspirato
KRMN45.78-2.43
-5.04%
Karman Holdings Inc
LFCR7.24-0.52
-6.70%
Lifecore Biomedical

JFBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JFBR and QVCGP have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JFBR and QVCGP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JFBR
1D Price
Change %
JFBR100%
+2.58%
QVCGP - JFBR
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
QVCGA - JFBR
26%
Poorly correlated
+21.64%
IPW - JFBR
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.28%
RDBBF - JFBR
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.33%
DIBS - JFBR
10%
Poorly correlated
-5.09%
More

QVCGA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QVCGA has been loosely correlated with QVCGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QVCGA jumps, then QVCGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QVCGA
1D Price
Change %
QVCGA100%
+21.64%
QVCGP - QVCGA
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
EBAY - QVCGA
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
JFBR - QVCGA
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.58%
BYON - QVCGA
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.88%
JD - QVCGA
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
More