JFBHF
Price
$166.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 19 closing price
TRN
Price
$37.37
Change
-$0.50 (-1.32%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
96 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

JFBHF vs TRN

Header iconJFBHF vs TRN Comparison
Open Charts JFBHF vs TRNBanner chart's image
Jungfraubahn Holding Ag
Price$166.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$894
CapitalizationN/A
Trinity Industries
Price$37.37
Change-$0.50 (-1.32%)
Volume$387.93K
CapitalizationN/A
JFBHF vs TRN Comparison Chart
Loading...
TRN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JFBHF vs. TRN commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFBHF is a Hold and TRN is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (JFBHF: $166.00 vs. TRN: $37.37)
Brand notoriety: JFBHF and TRN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Railroads industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JFBHF: 100% vs. TRN: 72%
Market capitalization -- JFBHF: $1.07B vs. TRN: $3.07B
JFBHF [@Railroads] is valued at $1.07B. TRN’s [@Railroads] market capitalization is $3.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Railroads] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Railroads] industry is $16.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JFBHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • JFBHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRN is a better buy in the long-term than JFBHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TRN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TRN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

JFBHF (@Railroads) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TRN (@Railroads) price change was +1.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Railroads industry was -1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

TRN is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Railroads (-1.67% weekly)

The Railroad industry includes passenger and freight transportation services along rail lines. This also includes companies that provide maintenance and switching duties as part of rail services. Within North America, the industry is largely dominated by some large operators. Several short-line railroads serve regional and local routes. Union Pacific Corporation, Canadian National Railway Company, and CSX Corporation are some of the prominent names in the business. The railroad business is relatively cyclical; economic expansion boost the freight services in particular, while economic stagnation often dampens transportation demand.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRN($3.07B) has a higher market cap than JFBHF($1.07B). TRN has higher P/E ratio than JFBHF: TRN (16.61) vs JFBHF (13.05). TRN YTD gains are higher at: 46.053 vs. JFBHF (0.000).
JFBHFTRNJFBHF / TRN
Capitalization1.07B3.07B35%
EBITDAN/A823M-
Gain YTD0.00046.053-
P/E Ratio13.0516.6179%
RevenueN/A3.25B-
Total CashN/A222M-
Total DebtN/A5.7B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JFBHF vs TRN: Fundamental Ratings
JFBHF
TRN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4919
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1616
SMR RATING
1..100
9854
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10088
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TRN's Valuation (32) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as JFBHF (47) in the null industry. This means that TRN’s stock grew similarly to JFBHF’s over the last 12 months.

TRN's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as JFBHF (16) in the null industry. This means that TRN’s stock grew similarly to JFBHF’s over the last 12 months.

TRN's SMR Rating (54) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JFBHF (98) in the null industry. This means that TRN’s stock grew somewhat faster than JFBHF’s over the last 12 months.

TRN's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as JFBHF (69) in the null industry. This means that TRN’s stock grew similarly to JFBHF’s over the last 12 months.

TRN's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as JFBHF (100) in the null industry. This means that TRN’s stock grew similarly to JFBHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TRN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
TRN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

JFBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JFBHF and TRN have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JFBHF and TRN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JFBHF
1D Price
Change %
JFBHF100%
N/A
TRN - JFBHF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
GRPTF - JFBHF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EJPRY - JFBHF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
GRPOF - JFBHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTRJF - JFBHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TRN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRN has been loosely correlated with GBX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRN jumps, then GBX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRN
1D Price
Change %
TRN100%
-1.32%
GBX - TRN
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
WAB - TRN
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
CSX - TRN
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.33%
UNP - TRN
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.01%
NSC - TRN
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
More