JFBC
Price
$22.05
Change
+$0.40 (+1.85%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
93.37M
JMSB
Price
$18.86
Change
+$0.05 (+0.27%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
266.71M
One day until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

JFBC vs JMSB

Header iconJFBC vs JMSB Comparison
Open Charts JFBC vs JMSBBanner chart's image
Jeffersonville Ban
Price$22.05
Change+$0.40 (+1.85%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization93.37M
John Marshall Ban
Price$18.86
Change+$0.05 (+0.27%)
Volume$36.52K
Capitalization266.71M
JFBC vs JMSB Comparison Chart in %
JFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JMSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JFBC vs. JMSB commentary
Oct 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFBC is a Hold and JMSB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 20, 2025
Stock price -- (JFBC: $22.05 vs. JMSB: $18.86)
Brand notoriety: JFBC and JMSB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JFBC: 71% vs. JMSB: 233%
Market capitalization -- JFBC: $93.37M vs. JMSB: $266.71M
JFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $93.37M. JMSB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $266.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JFBC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJMSB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • JFBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JMSB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, JFBC is a better buy in the long-term than JMSB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JFBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JMSB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JFBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • JMSB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JFBC is a better buy in the short-term than JMSB.

Price Growth

JFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.00% price change this week, while JMSB (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

JMSB is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JMSB($267M) has a higher market cap than JFBC($93.4M). JMSB has higher P/E ratio than JFBC: JMSB (14.29) vs JFBC (8.35). JFBC YTD gains are higher at: 16.140 vs. JMSB (-4.556). JMSB has more cash in the bank: 10.5M vs. JFBC (7.12M). JFBC has less debt than JMSB: JFBC (427K) vs JMSB (85.6M). JMSB has higher revenues than JFBC: JMSB (58.2M) vs JFBC (29.2M).
JFBCJMSBJFBC / JMSB
Capitalization93.4M267M35%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.140-4.556-354%
P/E Ratio8.3514.2958%
Revenue29.2M58.2M50%
Total Cash7.12M10.5M68%
Total Debt427K85.6M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JFBC vs JMSB: Fundamental Ratings
JFBC
JMSB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5065
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4161
SMR RATING
1..100
4957
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4854
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3175
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JFBC's Valuation (63) in the null industry is in the same range as JMSB (72). This means that JFBC’s stock grew similarly to JMSB’s over the last 12 months.

JFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as JMSB (61). This means that JFBC’s stock grew similarly to JMSB’s over the last 12 months.

JFBC's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as JMSB (57). This means that JFBC’s stock grew similarly to JMSB’s over the last 12 months.

JFBC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as JMSB (54). This means that JFBC’s stock grew similarly to JMSB’s over the last 12 months.

JFBC's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JMSB (75). This means that JFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than JMSB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JFBCJMSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JMSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBOEY25.980.20
+0.78%
Deutsche Boerse AG
DPNEF0.06N/A
N/A
Daphne International Holdings Ltd.
INBP0.31N/A
N/A
Integrated BioPharma, Inc.
MDRSF66.68N/A
N/A
MEDARTIS HOLDING AG
DKDRF5.30-0.02
-0.47%
NEWMED ENERGY LTD.

JFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JFBC and CCRDF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JFBC and CCRDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JFBC
1D Price
Change %
JFBC100%
+1.85%
CCRDF - JFBC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JMSB - JFBC
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
JFWV - JFBC
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITCFY - JFBC
10%
Poorly correlated
-7.72%
JPPHY - JFBC
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JMSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JMSB has been closely correlated with MCBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JMSB jumps, then MCBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JMSB
1D Price
Change %
JMSB100%
+0.27%
MCBS - JMSB
72%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
HTB - JMSB
70%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
CNOB - JMSB
70%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
IBOC - JMSB
69%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
CVBF - JMSB
69%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
More