Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JFACX vs RWMFX
JFACX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts JFACX vs RWMFX
JHancock Fundamental All Cap Core R2
Price$38.96
Change+$0.17 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets615.91M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.23
Change+$0.16 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
JFACX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JFACX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JFACX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. JFACX (616M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than JFACX: RWMFX (1.43) vs JFACX (0.00). JFACX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: JFACX (10 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). JFACX (1.29) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. JFACX (12.00). JFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: JFACX (0) vs RWMFX (250). JFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.69 vs. RWMFX (9.85). JFACX return over 5 years is better than : 75.73 vs. RWMFX (51.83).
| JFACX | RWMFX | JFACX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.31 | 394% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.31 | 416% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.478 | 8.475 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 616M | 205B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.69 | 9.85 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.31 | 30.71 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.73 | 51.83 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.54 | 85.03 | 184% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement