JDWPY
Price
$39.53
Change
+$1.53 (+4.03%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Capitalization
850.27M
MCD
Price
$317.21
Change
-$4.08 (-1.27%)
Updated
Mar 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
226.66B
44 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

JDWPY vs MCD

Header iconJDWPY vs MCD Comparison
Open Charts JDWPY vs MCDBanner chart's image
J.D. Wetherspoon
Price$39.53
Change+$1.53 (+4.03%)
Volume$101
Capitalization850.27M
McDonald's
Price$317.21
Change-$4.08 (-1.27%)
Volume$24.91K
Capitalization226.66B
JDWPY vs MCD Comparison Chart
Loading...
MCD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JDWPY vs. MCD commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JDWPY is a Hold and MCD is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (JDWPY: $38.00 vs. MCD: $305.77)
Brand notoriety: JDWPY: Not notable vs. MCD: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JDWPY: 150% vs. MCD: 121%
Market capitalization -- JDWPY: $850.27M vs. MCD: $226.66B
JDWPY [@Restaurants] is valued at $850.27M. MCD’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $226.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $226.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JDWPY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • JDWPY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCD is a better buy in the long-term than JDWPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MCD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

JDWPY (@Restaurants) experienced а -16.12% price change this week, while MCD (@Restaurants) price change was -1.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCD is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-2.54% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCD($227B) has a higher market cap than JDWPY($850M). MCD has higher P/E ratio than JDWPY: MCD (27.85) vs JDWPY (15.70). MCD YTD gains are higher at: 6.087 vs. JDWPY (-16.124).
JDWPYMCDJDWPY / MCD
Capitalization850M227B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-16.1246.087-265%
P/E Ratio15.7027.8556%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A51.9B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JDWPY vs MCD: Fundamental Ratings
JDWPY
MCD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9613
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10017
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8742
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCD's Valuation (21) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JDWPY (77) in the null industry. This means that MCD’s stock grew somewhat faster than JDWPY’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for JDWPY (100) in the null industry. This means that MCD’s stock grew significantly faster than JDWPY’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's SMR Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as JDWPY (100) in the null industry. This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to JDWPY’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as JDWPY (64) in the null industry. This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to JDWPY’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JDWPY (87) in the null industry. This means that MCD’s stock grew somewhat faster than JDWPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
26%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MCD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X87222.1950001156.515600
+1.34%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME24.30-0.10
-0.41%
GameStop Corp
AAPL235.93-2.10
-0.88%
Apple
SPY576.86-6.91
-1.18%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA272.04-12.61
-4.43%
Tesla

JDWPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JDWPY and DRI have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JDWPY and DRI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JDWPY
1D Price
Change %
JDWPY100%
N/A
DRI - JDWPY
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
MCD - JDWPY
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
CMPGF - JDWPY
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
SBUX - JDWPY
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.90%
CMPGY - JDWPY
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
More

MCD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCD has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCD jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCD
1D Price
Change %
MCD100%
+0.49%
YUM - MCD
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
QSR - MCD
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
PZZA - MCD
29%
Poorly correlated
+4.62%
RRGB - MCD
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
DRI - MCD
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
More