JDWPF
Price
$9.47
Change
+$1.97 (+26.27%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
LKNCY
Price
$35.80
Change
+$0.69 (+1.97%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
10.16B
Interact to see
Advertisement

JDWPF vs LKNCY

Header iconJDWPF vs LKNCY Comparison
Open Charts JDWPF vs LKNCYBanner chart's image
J.D. Wetherspoon
Price$9.47
Change+$1.97 (+26.27%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization1.13B
Luckin Coffee
Price$35.80
Change+$0.69 (+1.97%)
Volume$1.74M
Capitalization10.16B
JDWPF vs LKNCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
JDWPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LKNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
JDWPF vs. LKNCY commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JDWPF is a Hold and LKNCY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (JDWPF: $9.47 vs. LKNCY: $35.80)
Brand notoriety: JDWPF and LKNCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: JDWPF: 145% vs. LKNCY: 105%
Market capitalization -- JDWPF: $1.13B vs. LKNCY: $10.16B
JDWPF [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.13B. LKNCY’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $10.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

JDWPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLKNCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • JDWPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LKNCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LKNCY is a better buy in the long-term than JDWPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JDWPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LKNCY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • JDWPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • LKNCY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LKNCY is a better buy in the short-term than JDWPF.

Price Growth

JDWPF (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LKNCY (@Restaurants) price change was +2.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LKNCY($10.2B) has a higher market cap than JDWPF($1.13B). LKNCY has higher P/E ratio than JDWPF: LKNCY (23.27) vs JDWPF (13.57). LKNCY YTD gains are higher at: 39.462 vs. JDWPF (-2.022). LKNCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.79B vs. JDWPF (252M). LKNCY has more cash in the bank: 5.93B vs. JDWPF (75.2M). JDWPF has less debt than LKNCY: JDWPF (1.19B) vs LKNCY (5.7B). LKNCY has higher revenues than JDWPF: LKNCY (37.1B) vs JDWPF (2.07B).
JDWPFLKNCYJDWPF / LKNCY
Capitalization1.13B10.2B11%
EBITDA252M5.79B4%
Gain YTD-2.02239.462-5%
P/E Ratio13.5723.2758%
Revenue2.07B37.1B6%
Total Cash75.2M5.93B1%
Total Debt1.19B5.7B21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JDWPF vs LKNCY: Fundamental Ratings
JDWPF
LKNCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5035
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8325
SMR RATING
1..100
8628
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9244
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5595

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LKNCY's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as JDWPF (70). This means that LKNCY’s stock grew similarly to JDWPF’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JDWPF (83). This means that LKNCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than JDWPF’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JDWPF (86). This means that LKNCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than JDWPF’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as JDWPF (49). This means that LKNCY’s stock grew similarly to JDWPF’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JDWPF (92). This means that LKNCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than JDWPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JDWPFLKNCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JDWPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LKNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NSTS12.330.09
+0.76%
NSTS Bancorp
ATKR71.150.38
+0.54%
Atkore
GLP52.98N/A
N/A
Global Partners LP
AFJKU11.25N/A
N/A
Aimei Health Technology Co Ltd
QBTS14.02-0.04
-0.28%
D-Wave Quantum

JDWPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JDWPF and KRIUF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JDWPF and KRIUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JDWPF
1D Price
Change %
JDWPF100%
N/A
KRIUF - JDWPF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKNCY - JDWPF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
JBFCF - JDWPF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
HDALF - JDWPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MARZF - JDWPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LKNCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LKNCY and YUMC have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LKNCY and YUMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKNCY
1D Price
Change %
LKNCY100%
+1.97%
YUMC - LKNCY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
HDALF - LKNCY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTYFF - LKNCY
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
GGGSF - LKNCY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PZRIF - LKNCY
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
More