Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JDVCX vs RLBFX
JDVCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts JDVCX vs RLBFX
JPMorgan Diversified C
Price$15.28
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets422.32M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.43
Change-$0.07 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
JDVCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JDVCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JDVCX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. JDVCX (422M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than JDVCX: RLBFX (2.19) vs JDVCX (2.03). JDVCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: JDVCX (23 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). JDVCX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). JDVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JDVCX: RLBFX (250) vs JDVCX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. JDVCX (3.38). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.38 vs. JDVCX (-6.24).
| JDVCX | RLBFX | JDVCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.29 | 503% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.29 | 617% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.326 | 2.344 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 422M | 270B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 2.19 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.38 | 14.57 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.05 | 39.01 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.24 | 38.38 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.68 | 92.91 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers