Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JDMAX vs WFDDX
JDMAX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts JDMAX vs WFDDX
Janus Henderson Enterprise A
Price$138.53
Change-$0.16 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.41B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$29.02
Change-$0.12 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets954.85M
JDMAX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JDMAX vs. WFDDX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JDMAX is a Hold and WFDDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JDMAX has more cash in the bank: 23.4B vs. WFDDX (955M). JDMAX pays higher dividends than WFDDX: JDMAX (0.75) vs WFDDX (0.00). JDMAX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: JDMAX (16 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). WFDDX (1.17) and JDMAX (1.14) have similar cost to investors . WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. JDMAX (15.00). JDMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: JDMAX (2500) vs WFDDX (1000000). WFDDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.58 vs. JDMAX (1.24). JDMAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.42 vs. WFDDX (-27.45).
| JDMAX | WFDDX | JDMAX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.14 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.17 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.690 | 4.690 | 79% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.4B | 955M | 2,450% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.24 | 1.58 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.53 | 12.66 | 4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.42 | -27.45 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.05 | -18.30 | -290% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement